2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.02073.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An objective, rapid and reproducible method for scoring AFLP peak-height data that minimizes genotyping error

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
90
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Size and peak height of fragments between 100 and 500 bp were determined using GeneMapper v.3.7 (Applied Biosystems). Bins were checked by eye and preprocessed for threshold optimization for locus retention and phenotype calling with AFLP-SCORE 1.4a (Whitlock et al, 2008) following (Mattersdorfer et al, 2012). The average mismatch error rate was 1.26%.…”
Section: Samples and Molecular Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Size and peak height of fragments between 100 and 500 bp were determined using GeneMapper v.3.7 (Applied Biosystems). Bins were checked by eye and preprocessed for threshold optimization for locus retention and phenotype calling with AFLP-SCORE 1.4a (Whitlock et al, 2008) following (Mattersdorfer et al, 2012). The average mismatch error rate was 1.26%.…”
Section: Samples and Molecular Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Error rates e 1 and e 2 are, respectively, the probability of mis-scoring either a '1' allele or a '0' allele. The initial and final numbers of loci refer to the initial number of fragment length classes (bins) considered, and the final number of loci retained for analysis after scoring via AFLPSCORE (Whitlock et al, 2008b). The number of replicates refers to the number of replicate pairs of fingerprints from which genotyping error was estimated.…”
Section: Outlier Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nomenclature for AFLP scoring thresholds follows Whitlock et al (2008b), and these are given as values of relative fluorescence units. Error rates e 1 and e 2 are, respectively, the probability of mis-scoring either a '1' allele or a '0' allele.…”
Section: Outlier Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To reduce the occurrence of homoplasy bins with fragment-length distributions that overlapped with adjacent bins were also removed. Raw peak intensity data output from Genotyper was subsequently transformed into a binary data matrix with AFLPScore R-script (Whitlock et al 2008). Given that our main objective was to investigate spatial genetic structure and it may arise both due to isolation-by-distance or due to spatial variation of selective forces affecting the distribution of alleles of specific loci (Beaumont and Balding 2004), only neutral loci were selected for the analyses.…”
Section: Dna Extraction and Aflp Genotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%