2006
DOI: 10.1080/01658100600599477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Objective Method for Measuring Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect in Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy—Stimulus Optimization

Abstract: Purpose: To develop a new technique for measuring relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) and to find the best stimulus parameters for detecting glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Methods: With a newly constructed pupillometer based on digital video recording, pupillary light reflexes were analyzed during alternating light stimulation. Pupil area was measured in each video frame using computer digital image analysis. The examinations were performed using different sets of stimulus-pause combinations. Subjects wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21–24 With the introduction of infrared video pupillography, studies have generally reported a detection rate of 29–68% overall, and of 82% for asymmetric glaucoma. 2528 In our study, the mean absolute between-eye score for controls was 0.14, and 0.34 was the cutoff at 2 standard deviations. At this cutoff, an RAPD was present in 47% of glaucoma patients and 3% of controls, suggesting that the amount of asymmetry needed to segregate the two groups may be too large and therefore using just an RAPD between eyes will miss nearly half the individuals with glaucoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…21–24 With the introduction of infrared video pupillography, studies have generally reported a detection rate of 29–68% overall, and of 82% for asymmetric glaucoma. 2528 In our study, the mean absolute between-eye score for controls was 0.14, and 0.34 was the cutoff at 2 standard deviations. At this cutoff, an RAPD was present in 47% of glaucoma patients and 3% of controls, suggesting that the amount of asymmetry needed to segregate the two groups may be too large and therefore using just an RAPD between eyes will miss nearly half the individuals with glaucoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…4,2738 Studies generally have reported a higher detection rate of RAPD in patients with glaucoma using IVP (29%–68% overall, and 82% for asymmetric glaucoma) compared with studies using the SFT (9%–46%). 31,33–37 The findings of these studies are as follows: (1) RAPD is more likely to be present in patients with glaucoma than in controls. 33–35 (2) Patients with glaucoma have greater asymmetry in the IVP between the 2 eyes (as measured by pupil area ratio) 4,32 and greater differences in response to light between the superior and inferior visual field within the same eye.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…1). It has been described previously (Kalaboukhova et al 2006). In short, it consists of two digital highresolution video cameras [JAI M40 (60 Hz); JAI A-S, Copenhagen, Denmark), one for each eye; two white diode lamps (each is a set of 15 small diodes, ø 1.25 mm) (Nerlite S-40 Spot Illuminator, RVSI ⁄ NER, Weare, New Hampshire, USA) for alternating light stimulation; and a background infrared illumination device (Sony HVL-IRH2, Sony, Tokyo, Japan).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements were made with a custom-built infrared pupillometer using previously determined stimulus parameters (Kalaboukhova et al 2006). Measurements were made with a custom-built infrared pupillometer using previously determined stimulus parameters (Kalaboukhova et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation