1950
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)39171-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Objective Evaluation of Hypnosis in Obstetrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1952
1952
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Abramson and Heron, a shorter Kala I (3.2 hours) was obtained from 100 hypnotized women than from the control group of 88 women. Of the 45 women with hypnosis during labor (primigravidas), the first stage lasted an average of 4.5 hours, a significant decrease from the 12 hours of early dilation (latent phase) [10]. When someone is hypnotized, feelings of comfort and relaxation will be experienced [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Abramson and Heron, a shorter Kala I (3.2 hours) was obtained from 100 hypnotized women than from the control group of 88 women. Of the 45 women with hypnosis during labor (primigravidas), the first stage lasted an average of 4.5 hours, a significant decrease from the 12 hours of early dilation (latent phase) [10]. When someone is hypnotized, feelings of comfort and relaxation will be experienced [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, according to the research of Abramson and Heron, 100 women who used hypnobirthing experienced a shorter first stage (3,2 hours) than the control group of 88 women [10]. According to Mongan, 45 women who experienced hypnosis during childbirth (primigravidas) spent an average of 4.5 hours in the first stage, demonstrating a significant reduction of 12 hours beginning with the initial opening (latent phase) [2].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He came to the conclusion that hypnosis was a useful and harmless anaesthetic agent. Isolated enthusiastic reports of labours conducted under hypnosis have appeared in recent years in the medical press, but, with the exception of papers by Kroger and De Lee (1943) and Abramson and Heron (1950), no large series of cases have been reported in the English language. It should be pointed out at this stage that in Abramson and Heron's series of 100 cases the experimental group of patients (receiving hypnosis) were each given a mean amount of 103.5 mg. of pethidine during labour, whereas the control group of patients (not receiving hypnosis) received a mean of 123.6 mg. of pethidine.…”
Section: Relief Of Pain During Childbirthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies indicate the benefit of hypnosis in shortening the length of labor. Comparing 100 women trained with hypnosis prior to delivery with 88 women who had no hypnosis training, Abramson and Heron (1950) found a statistically significant difference in the length of labor. Stage 1 of labor was 3.23 hours shorter for women trained in hypnosis.…”
Section: Pain and Symptom Managementmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Relaxation, which is commonly an effect of hypnosis, may be an important therapeutic factor in childbirth preparation and delivery. Although their study measured length of labor rather than felt pain, Abramson and Heron (1950) used suggestions emphasizing relaxation, so that labor could be approached with a calm, detached attitude, with no attempt to induce analgesia. As noted earlier, the use of hypnosis resulted in significantly shortened first and second phases of labor for the 100 women in the treatment group compared with a control group of 78 women.…”
Section: Psychological Aspects Of Childbirthmentioning
confidence: 99%