2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An object location memory paradigm for older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subjects were presented with a street map on which buildings were shown at different correct and incorrect positions. In this “statistical” learning paradigm (“LOCATO,” see also Kulzow et al, 2014 ), the “correct” position of a building occurred more frequently (10 times more often than any of the incorrect positions, which were shown only once) over the course of five training blocks. Outcome measures were learning success at the end of each session (after atDCS and sham) as well as immediate and delayed free recall one week later.…”
Section: Review Of Recent Tdcs Studies On Cognitive Decline In Older mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects were presented with a street map on which buildings were shown at different correct and incorrect positions. In this “statistical” learning paradigm (“LOCATO,” see also Kulzow et al, 2014 ), the “correct” position of a building occurred more frequently (10 times more often than any of the incorrect positions, which were shown only once) over the course of five training blocks. Outcome measures were learning success at the end of each session (after atDCS and sham) as well as immediate and delayed free recall one week later.…”
Section: Review Of Recent Tdcs Studies On Cognitive Decline In Older mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, patients were asked to pick out the items they have seen before and relocated them to previous positions (Kessels et al, 2000); the patients relocated the same objects to the positions previously presented (positions-only condition), different objects to the position marked by dots (object-to-position-assignment condition), different objects to the position without marks (combined condition) (Postma and De Haan, 1996; Kessels et al, 2002, 2010; van Asselen et al, 2008; Mazurek et al, 2015). Some paradigms also use pictures of real-life objects (e.g., buildings) on a map to recognize objects-location pairings (Kulzow et al, 2014; Edler et al, 2015). The 4 Mountains Test (4MT) is another brief behavioral test of spatial memory, and performance on it has been found to diagnose AD with high sensitivity and specificity (Hartley et al, 2007; Bird et al, 2010; Moodley et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visuospatial memory training was administered using the OLM paradigm [25,74], which was adopted for use in a 3-day OLM training (LOCATO-30) and is described in detail elsewhere [21]. In brief, subjects had to learn 30 object-location pairings on a two-dimensional street map over the course of five learning blocks at each day, followed by a recall task (see also Fig.…”
Section: Training Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%