2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2014.08.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An object-level strategy for pan-sharpening quality assessment of high-resolution satellite imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quality of the pansharpened image was inconsistent among the different regions and different land covers; thus, most of the quantitative quality assessment strategies that involve assigning a single value to the whole image could not efficiently evaluate the effectiveness of the pansharpening methods [44]. An object-level or land-cover-based pansharpening quality assessment strategy could overcome the limitations of the traditional quantitative quality assessment strategies, evaluate the performance of the pansharpening process for different land covers, and quantify the quality of different land covers, thus improving our understanding of the influence of pansharpening methods across different land covers [15,44]. However, relevant research has only focused on a few types of land covers [15,44], and it is necessary to evaluate the performance of the pansharpening process for more land covers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The quality of the pansharpened image was inconsistent among the different regions and different land covers; thus, most of the quantitative quality assessment strategies that involve assigning a single value to the whole image could not efficiently evaluate the effectiveness of the pansharpening methods [44]. An object-level or land-cover-based pansharpening quality assessment strategy could overcome the limitations of the traditional quantitative quality assessment strategies, evaluate the performance of the pansharpening process for different land covers, and quantify the quality of different land covers, thus improving our understanding of the influence of pansharpening methods across different land covers [15,44]. However, relevant research has only focused on a few types of land covers [15,44], and it is necessary to evaluate the performance of the pansharpening process for more land covers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An object-level or land-cover-based pansharpening quality assessment strategy could overcome the limitations of the traditional quantitative quality assessment strategies, evaluate the performance of the pansharpening process for different land covers, and quantify the quality of different land covers, thus improving our understanding of the influence of pansharpening methods across different land covers [15,44]. However, relevant research has only focused on a few types of land covers [15,44], and it is necessary to evaluate the performance of the pansharpening process for more land covers. The objective of the present study was to elucidate the effects of commonly used pansharpening methods when they are applied to GF-2 imagery by performing quality assessments based on the region and land cover.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an initial study, DadrasJavan and Samadzadegan (2014) have proposed an objectlevel strategy for the quality assessment of pan-sharpening products. Then, Dehnavi and Mohammadzadeh (2015) performed a class-based fusion to find out the best parameters of some fusion methods which are suitable for particular land covers.…”
Section: Conventional Strategies For Quality Assessment Of Pan-sharpe...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to the similar studies that set the image segments as their image objects for their object-level IQA calculations (i.e. DadrasJavan and Samadzadegan 2014, Restaino et al 2016, Rodríguez-Esparragón et al 2017, we arranged the image classes (derived from classification) as the objects for the object-level SQA to understand semantic relations between specific land covers and fusion functions. In the following, the procedure of image object extraction and object-level SQA is explained.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of either MS or PAN images alone means that parts of information content are discarded. Image fusion techniques are frequently used to combine two or more images to produce enhanced images (Pohl and Van Genderen, 1998;DadrasJavan and Samadzadegan, 2014;Alidoost et al, 2015;Jagalingam and Hegde, 2015). When a fusion method is used to fuse MS and PAN images of the same scene acquired by the same satellite, the fusion task is called "pan-sharpening".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%