2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvcir.2019.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An object counting network based on hierarchical context and feature fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As is shown in Table 3, the proposed method gets a 0.3% improvement of MAE with Li et al [19] and achieves the lowest 85.9 of MAE among them, except the method proposed in [15]. Compared to the method proposed in [15], the result of the proposed method on Shanghaitech_A is lower than it by 5.9% and the proposed method achieves higher performance on TRANCOS by 29.4%. Combining the comparison of TRANCOS and Shanghaitech_A, the proposed method has a competitive performance with the method proposed in [15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As is shown in Table 3, the proposed method gets a 0.3% improvement of MAE with Li et al [19] and achieves the lowest 85.9 of MAE among them, except the method proposed in [15]. Compared to the method proposed in [15], the result of the proposed method on Shanghaitech_A is lower than it by 5.9% and the proposed method achieves higher performance on TRANCOS by 29.4%. Combining the comparison of TRANCOS and Shanghaitech_A, the proposed method has a competitive performance with the method proposed in [15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…We compare the proposed Count‐DANet with several counting methods and it achieves a significant improvement on different items in the GAME metric, and the detailed results are shown in Table 1. It can be deduced that the Count‐DANet has a 29.4% improvement of GAME(0) over Zhang et al [15] on this dataset and also outperforms other methods, except for the method proposed in [19]. Compared to the method proposed in [19], the proposed method achieves an inferior result than it and the value of the proposed method GAME(0) is only lower by 0.1 point, showing that the proposed method has a competitive performance with the method proposed in [19].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations