2010
DOI: 10.1124/mol.110.066340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An N-Terminal Polybasic Motif of GαqIs Required for Signaling and Influences Membrane Nanodomain Distribution

Abstract: Regions of basic amino acids in proteins can promote membrane localization through electrostatic interactions with negatively charged membrane lipid head groups. Previous work showed that the heterotrimeric G protein subunit ␣ q contains a polybasic region in its N terminus that contributes to plasma membrane localization. Here, the role of the N-terminal polybasic region of ␣ q in signaling was addressed. For ␣ q mutants, loss of plasma membrane localization correlated with loss of signaling function, as meas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 20 This assay allowed us to identify the modulators of nanoclustering 20 as well as the inhibitors of processes upstream of nanoclustering, such as membrane targeting and lipid modifications (for example, statins or farnesylation inhibitors). 21 , 22 , 23 These results illustrate that modulation of the nanoclustering-FRET signal can be due to multiple reasons that may involve direct modulation of the membrane, 20 lateral segregation changes of the FRET-probe, 24 conformational changes 25 or indirect, intracellular processes. 22 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“… 20 This assay allowed us to identify the modulators of nanoclustering 20 as well as the inhibitors of processes upstream of nanoclustering, such as membrane targeting and lipid modifications (for example, statins or farnesylation inhibitors). 21 , 22 , 23 These results illustrate that modulation of the nanoclustering-FRET signal can be due to multiple reasons that may involve direct modulation of the membrane, 20 lateral segregation changes of the FRET-probe, 24 conformational changes 25 or indirect, intracellular processes. 22 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…7B), G␣ q does not seem to function by relocating p63RhoGEF to specific locales on the membrane or by reorienting the catalytic core. However, because both p63RhoGEF and G␣ q are palmitoylated, it is possible that they are already found in the same lipid microdomains (26,45,46), and we also cannot rule out the possibility that locale-specific recruitment may be important for endogenous p63RhoGEF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thus, it seems that p63RhoGEF and, by extension, the homologous domains in Trio and Duet are regulated by G␣ q primarily through an allosteric mechanism that involves release of PH domain-mediated autoinhibition (25). However, in cells, it is also possible that G␣ q recruits p63RhoGEF to specific locales on the PM (26) or repositions the RhoGEF at the membrane so that it can more productively interact with its substrate RhoA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example Gα q contains 10 basic residues, both arginines and lysines, within amino acids 16–38. Most importantly, helical predictions indicate that most of the positively charged N-terminal amino acids align on one face of the helix, grouped together to form basic patches in position to interact with negatively charged surfaces of cellular membranes (Kosloff et al 2002; Crouthamel et al 2008, 2010; Pedone and Hepler 2007). Indeed, replacement of select N-terminal basic amino acids in Gα s and Gα q with non-charged alanines or glutamines results in decreased membrane localization of the mutant Gα s and Gα q compared to wild type (Crouthamel et al 2008).…”
Section: 2 Mechanisms Of Membrane Binding By G Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%