2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2018.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An MRI evaluation of the effects of qat chewing habit on the temporomandibular joint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 These osteoarthritic effects of QCH on the TMJ may help explain the higher prevalence of clinical findings observed among QC (Tables 1 and 2). The said higher prevalence of osteoarthritis changes recorded in the current study (90%), as compared with Almashraqi et al MRI-based study, 5 can be ascribed to the different imaging modalities used in the two studies. In the current study, CBCT was used which is superior to MRI in detecting minor osseous changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…5 These osteoarthritic effects of QCH on the TMJ may help explain the higher prevalence of clinical findings observed among QC (Tables 1 and 2). The said higher prevalence of osteoarthritis changes recorded in the current study (90%), as compared with Almashraqi et al MRI-based study, 5 can be ascribed to the different imaging modalities used in the two studies. In the current study, CBCT was used which is superior to MRI in detecting minor osseous changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…5,7,[11][12][13] Apart from the chewing habits, unilateral chewing showed significant difference in many clinical findings compared to bilateral chewing. [24][25][26][27] Considering QC alone, no statistically significant differences were reported between the chewing and non-chewing sides, and such findings are consistent with the findings of previous studies conducted by Almashraqi et al 5,7 The qat chewing side was not a determinant factor of differences in dimensional measurements compared to the non-chewing side, except for increased condylar length and thicker trabecular bone in the chewing side (Table 5). For their part, Kurita et al 37 and…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations