2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2011.11.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An MILP formulation for the synthesis of protein purification processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Vasquez-Alvarez et al model that minimizes the number of chromatography steps through optimal starting and finishing cut points. The proposed optimization model is then extended in Polykarpou et al (2012) using approximation techniques to overcome computational challenges. Note that aforementioned studies aim to minimize the number of chromatography steps but do not account for costs related to shortage (lost sale) and failures.…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Vasquez-Alvarez et al model that minimizes the number of chromatography steps through optimal starting and finishing cut points. The proposed optimization model is then extended in Polykarpou et al (2012) using approximation techniques to overcome computational challenges. Note that aforementioned studies aim to minimize the number of chromatography steps but do not account for costs related to shortage (lost sale) and failures.…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, Polykarpou et al (2011) incorporated both starting and finishing cut-points for each chromatographic step as optimisation decision variables. Later, this work was extended by developing efficient MILP models with the discretisation approximation (Polykarpou et al, 2012a) and piecewise linearisation approximation (Polykarpou et al, 2012b) to overcome the computational difficulty of MINLP models. These models use the number of chromatography steps, purity and yield as performance metrics, but do not account for the cost of the process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, the process synthesis optimization has also considered product loss by incorporating the decisions on the time of product collection and the start and finishing cut‐points . More recently, efficient MILP models were developed using the discretization and piecewise linearization approximation to overcome the computational expense of MINLP models. These models use the number of chromatography steps, purity, and yield as performance metrics, but do not account for overall process costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%