An LCA of the Pelamis wave energy converter

Abstract

Purpose To date, very few studies have attempted to quantify the environmental impacts of a wave energy converter, and almost all of these focus solely on the potential climate change impacts and embodied energy. This paper presents a full life cycle assessment (LCA) of the first-generation Pelamis wave energy converter, aiming to contribute to the body of published studies and examine any potential trade-offs or co-benefits across a broad range of environmental impacts. Methods The process-based attributional LCA was carried out on the full cradle-to-grave life cycle of the Pelamis P1 wave energy converter, including the device, its moorings and sub-sea connecting cable up to the point of connection with the grid. The case study was for a typical wave farm located off the north-west coast of Scotland. Foreground data was mostly sourced from the manufacturer. Background inventory data was mostly sourced from the ecoinvent database (v3.3), and the ReCiPe and CED impact assessment methods were applied. Results and discussion The Pelamis was found to have significantly lower environmental impacts than conventional fossil generation in 6 impact categories, but performed worse than most other types of generation in 8 of the remaining 13 categories studied. The greatest impacts were from steel manufacture and sea vessel operations. The device performs quite well in the two most frequently assessed impacts for renewable energy converters: climate change and cumulative energy demand. The carbon payback period is estimated to be around 24 months (depending on the emissions intensity of the displaced generation mix), and the energy return on investment is 7.5. The contrast between this and the poor performance in other impact categories demonstrates the limitations of focussing only on carbon and energy. Conclusions The Pelamis was found to generally have relatively high environmental impacts across many impact categories when compared to other types of power generation; however, these are mostly attributable to the current reliance on fossil fuels in the global economy and the early development stage of the technology. Opportunities to reduce this also lie in reducing requirements for steel in the device structure, and decreasing the requirements for sea vessel operations during installation, maintenance and decommissioning. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s11367-018-1504-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Life Cycle Assessment on Wave and Tidal Energy Systems: A Review of Current Methodological Practice

“…Geographical distribution of the selected LCA studies, as shown in Table 1, indicates that 11 systems are installed in European seas [3,9,11,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19]22,23], 1 in New Zealand [12], 1 in China [20] and 1 in multicontinental locations [22]; three are located at hypothetical offshore locations [4,21,24].…”

“…As shown in Figure 1, the selected literature studied two oscillating surge WECs [22,25], one oscillating water column [21], three attenuators [14][15][16][17], two overtopping [3,23], four point absorbers [4,19,20,22], one vertical axis tidal [9], eight horizontal axis tidal [11][12][13]25], one Archimedes [13] and one tidal range [25].…”

“…Installed capacities of the studied systems range from 3 kW to 265.5 MW, as shown in Table 1. Only five studies take the capacity factors of the power generation systems for consideration [11,12,17,20,24]. As Figure 1b demonstrates, two systems are under proposal [12,24]; three are under development [4,21,22]; eight have prototypes installed and tested [3,13,14,19,20,23]; two are commercialized [15,17]; five are claimed being installed as of writing of the papers or reports, however with no further details provided regarding the installation, e.g., it is unknown whether they are pioneer plants or full-scale commercialized systems [9,11,13,18,25].…”

“…Currently, ideal practice of LCA is to follow the principles, framework, requirements and guidelines by international standards ISO 14040 (2006a) and 14044 (2006). Our review of the selected literature shows that only five studies claim that they followed ISO 14040 [11,14,15,20,21], two studies claimed that they followed ISO 14044 [12,17], and two claimed that they followed both ISO 14040 and 14044 [4,13].…”

“…LCI results are normally calculated and interpreted through such indicators as energy intensity and carbon intensity, as well as energy and carbon payback. Inclusion of LCIA in the LCA studies can comprehensively illustrate the life cycle environmental performance of the studied systems, thus various levels of LCIA were conducted to further reveal the environmental impacts of the wave and tidal systems beyond energy consumption and carbon emission [3,4,9,[15][16][17][20][21][22]24,25].…”