1973
DOI: 10.1016/0146-664x(73)90016-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An iterative prediction and correction method for automatic stereocomparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Levine, O'Handley, and Yagi [71 use an adaptive correlation window, the size of which varies inversely with the variance of the region surrounding the point. Mori, Kidode, and Asada [12] use a Gaussianweighted correlation window to minimize the errors due to distortion of the extremities. They also vary the window size with ambiguity of the match and use a prediction/correction algorithm, modifying one image to fit the other according to a predicted matching and iteratively using the error of fit to improve the prediction.…”
Section: Introduction Differences In Images Of Real World Scenes Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Levine, O'Handley, and Yagi [71 use an adaptive correlation window, the size of which varies inversely with the variance of the region surrounding the point. Mori, Kidode, and Asada [12] use a Gaussianweighted correlation window to minimize the errors due to distortion of the extremities. They also vary the window size with ambiguity of the match and use a prediction/correction algorithm, modifying one image to fit the other according to a predicted matching and iteratively using the error of fit to improve the prediction.…”
Section: Introduction Differences In Images Of Real World Scenes Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of stereopsis use a fixed camera model to constrain the search to one dimension [5], [7], [81, [12]. Nevatia uses a series of progressive views to constrain disparity to small values [8].…”
Section: Introduction Differences In Images Of Real World Scenes Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example in traditional approaches with regularization and Markov Random Fields, continuation [9] and simulated annealing [28] have been used; and in more recent approaches max-flow [70] and graph-cut [45] have been employed to solve the global optimization problems. Local stereo matching methods generally fall into two broad categories [19]: area-based (e.g., [59], [38], [65]) and feature-based techniques (e.g., [64], [58]). Area-based algorithms are employed to solve the correspondence problem for every single pixel in the image.…”
Section: Stereo Correspondence Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, choosing the right size for the regions is not easy, as in most cases smaller regions will lead to more mismatches but shorter run-time; while larger regions will produce more accurate results at the expense of higher computational time. Well known algorithms of this type are by Mori et al [59], Hannah [38] and Okutomi and Kanade [65].…”
Section: Stereo Correspondence Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stereo matching by computing correlation or sum of squared differences (SSD) is a basic technique for obtaining a dense depth map from images [MSK89] [FP86][Woo83] [MKA73]. A central problem with this method lies in selecting an appropriate window size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%