2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.11.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An iterative multiscale finite volume algorithm converging to the exact solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We refer to [29,30] for further details and for an extensive description of the construction of the conservative velocity field.…”
Section: The Msfv Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We refer to [29,30] for further details and for an extensive description of the construction of the conservative velocity field.…”
Section: The Msfv Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different strategies have been proposed to estimate the neglected transversal fluxes and improve the accuracy of the MsFV method [10,30]. Following [30], we construct an iterative scheme that uses the pressure residual, r À Ap, to estimate the transversal fluxes and combines the MsFV operator with a Krylov subspace accelerator.…”
Section: Iterative Improvement Of the Local Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Contrary to classical domain decomposition methods, MCDD will produce solutions that are mass conservative at any iteration step, thus it is not necessary to reduce the pressure residual to a very low value before solving transport equations. Various aspects of MCDD have been tested for two-dimensional problems (Kippe, et al, 2008;Sandvin, et al, 2011;Lunati, et al, 2011). However, to formulate multiscale methods for three-dimensional problems has turned out to be considerably more difficult in general, and to our knowledge, no applications of MCDDtype methods within an iterative setting have been reported in three dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%