2013 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/ivs.2013.6629531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An iterative dynamic programming approach for the global optimal control of hybrid electric vehicles under real-time constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The predicted N step finite-horizon velocity profile can change at any instance for reasons like new traffic participants or speed limits entering the electronic horizon, which leads to replanning of the longitudinal trajectory. Therefore, the problem is solved for the finite-horizon every timestep while only the first result u 0 is used, similarly to a model predictive control algorithm [3]. The formulation of the enhanced problem includes all necessary information to optimize energy efficiency as well as wear and comfort.…”
Section: B Formulation Of An Enhanced Optimization Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The predicted N step finite-horizon velocity profile can change at any instance for reasons like new traffic participants or speed limits entering the electronic horizon, which leads to replanning of the longitudinal trajectory. Therefore, the problem is solved for the finite-horizon every timestep while only the first result u 0 is used, similarly to a model predictive control algorithm [3]. The formulation of the enhanced problem includes all necessary information to optimize energy efficiency as well as wear and comfort.…”
Section: B Formulation Of An Enhanced Optimization Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RELATED WORK In hybrid electric vehicles (HEV), operation strategies aim to improve the energy efficiency by controlling torque split between EM and ICE. [3] shows that an adaptive cruise control based on model predictive control can improve the efficiency significantly due to an anticipatory driving strategy and the optimized operation of the powertrain components. Other work such as [4], [5], where the velocity is not controlled by the optimization algorithm but by the driver, is improving the efficiency of HEVs by control algorithms, which take the prediction of near-future driving situations into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For control of hybrid electric vehicle (HEV), iDP was used as dynamic optimization in a model predictive controller (MPC) (23) . With a short range of vehicle operation, iDP was reported to have potential in real-time applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a short range of vehicle operation, iDP was reported to have potential in real-time applications. To reduce the required memory and computational time, the state space is reduced as narrow as possible (23) . However, in many cases, where the state space can not be reduced, basic iDP must calculate all points in the state space, even they are not in the forward-reachable state space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IDP is a numeric method based on an iterated application of the Dynamic Programming approach, which involves: the choice of grid points for the control variables for each time instant inside the control horizon and the forward integration of the model; the application of Bellman's optimality principle proceeding backwards in time in order to choose the best control policy among the considered ones; the iteration of both these operations by refining the size of the search grid and focusing it around the best control policy found at each iteration. IDP has been applied for instance to chemical applications and optimization of biotechnological processes [44][45][46][47], vehicle control [48] and motion planning [49]. It has been applied to optimal control problems involving various classes of nonlinearities and high-dimensional systems while accounting for issues like the low sensitivity of the objective function with respect to the optimization variables and the splitting of the optimization horizon into stages of time-varying length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%