1995
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(95)00438-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An iterative difference-dedicated configuration interaction. Proposal and test studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to overcome the possible dependence of our results on the starting molecular orbital set, we have obtained the S -T average natural orbitals by means of an iterative procedure, proposed by Garcia et al 35 and implemented in the DDCI scheme. An average density matrix for the singlet and triplet states is built: R ϭ(R S ϩR T )/2.…”
Section: A Dependence Of the J Value On The Molecular Orbital Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to overcome the possible dependence of our results on the starting molecular orbital set, we have obtained the S -T average natural orbitals by means of an iterative procedure, proposed by Garcia et al 35 and implemented in the DDCI scheme. An average density matrix for the singlet and triplet states is built: R ϭ(R S ϩR T )/2.…”
Section: A Dependence Of the J Value On The Molecular Orbital Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting MOs are employed in subsequent DDCI calculations until convergence (iterative DDCI or IDDCI calculations). 90 This procedure has been shown to be efficient in eliminating any dependence of the DDCI results on the starting MOs, taking into account the orbital relaxation induced by the electron correlation. The shape of the so-obtained MOs is represented in Figure 5, the most relevant feature being the enhancement of the electron density on the central NO groups, which is in line with the increase of the calculated J bond value at DDCI(2/2) level (Table 2) Unfortunately, there are no experimental data available with respect to the spin density in compound 1 or any other of the compounds investigated in the present work, which could validate the shape of the optimized magnetic MOs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of dynamical correlation via NEVPT2 recovered some of the important contributions given by the bridging ligand orbitals to the super-exchange mechanism and both the experimental sign and an acceptable magnitude of 5.32 cm −1 for J 12 have been then reached. Possible strategies to further improve this result would require the introduction of a dedicated CI procedure [33] or equivalent [34] on top of the CASSCF instead of NEVPT2. Another possible source of the discrepancy can reside in the limited flexibility of the wavefunction resulting by a CAS(5,5), i.e., the so called 3d double-shell effect [35] or the missing of the explicit inclusion of bridging ligands orbitals in the CAS [35].…”
Section: X-ray Structurementioning
confidence: 99%