2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2019.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An iterative Bayesian filtering framework for fast and automated calibration of DEM models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, a DEM representative volume previous calibrated against oedometric experiments as obtained from 3DXRCT images Cheng et al (2018a)is probed with small perturbations. The numerical probes are performed with a wide range of magnitudes, along both forward and backward loading directions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper, a DEM representative volume previous calibrated against oedometric experiments as obtained from 3DXRCT images Cheng et al (2018a)is probed with small perturbations. The numerical probes are performed with a wide range of magnitudes, along both forward and backward loading directions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the calibration procedure and a posterior probability distribution of micromechanical parameters is already available from the Bayesian calibration Cheng et al (2018a), it would be interesting to see how the uncertainties at the microscale affect the dispersion relations at various wavelengths. Future work also involves using existing continuum models to better approximate the dispersion branches obtained from the DEM simulations, so as to accurately capture the change of dispersion relations with respect to stress history and anisotropy in the materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exciting pulse Iterative prior resampling (e.g. Cheng et al, 2019) is relatively simple and may contribute to better estimate the uncertainty. The algorithm (Fig.…”
Section: Snmrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical or optimisation‐based algorithms become popular to determine particle‐scale parameters in DEM as an inverse problem. Existing algorithms include the response surface methodology, artificial neural networks, Latin hypercube sampling and Kriging, random forest, the genetic algorithm, the sequential quasi‐Monte Carlo, and the Bayesian approach . Although these algorithms are useful to quantify a wide range of complex problems, their applications alone still suffer from numerical issues such as local optimum and time‐consuming iterative process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%