Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1978
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1978.tb00127.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An iterative approach to the analysis of EM autoradiographs

Abstract: The errors inherent in EM autoradiography are discussed and certain of them deemed to be of particular practical significance in the quantitative assessment of preparations. A method is described for estimating the standard errors attributable to each of several sources of variation and thence for obtaining the overall standard error value to be attached to relative activity estimates obtained in the method of Downs & Williams (1978). In an appendix, a fully worked example is given illustrating clearly the str… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At EM level, radiation scatter prevents precise localization of the radioactive molecule (source) according to individual grain position. The cross-fire analysis Parry, 1973, 1977;Downs and Williams, 1978;Salpeter et al, 1978;Williams and Downs, 1978) allows assessment of the source density for each substructure by adjustment of the result of a simulation ("cross-fire" matrix of hypothetical, generated source-grain sets systematically distributed over the tissue) to the distribution ofreal observed grains (observed grain vector). Grains were counted in section areas sampled systematically.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At EM level, radiation scatter prevents precise localization of the radioactive molecule (source) according to individual grain position. The cross-fire analysis Parry, 1973, 1977;Downs and Williams, 1978;Salpeter et al, 1978;Williams and Downs, 1978) allows assessment of the source density for each substructure by adjustment of the result of a simulation ("cross-fire" matrix of hypothetical, generated source-grain sets systematically distributed over the tissue) to the distribution ofreal observed grains (observed grain vector). Grains were counted in section areas sampled systematically.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OSD in muscle, axon, axon membrane, and intercellular space was close to zero. Following the "iterative deconvolution procedure" Williams and Downs, 1978), the primary model was then modified by suppression of empty source compartments. These new models were systematically tested.…”
Section: Labeling Of Nkfjsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparing these expected grain distributions with the observed grain distributions in an autoradiogram, the true sources can be identified, and their specific activities evaluated. Variants of this idea of analyzing EM autoradiograms by successive hypothesis testing have been published by Salpeter and co-workers (15,17,18), Blackett and Parry (1,2), and Williams and Downs (23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also supposed that all technical and developmental conditions in preparing the autoradiographs are rigorously standardized so as to minimize background, chemography , multiple hits and departures from the required geometric characteristics of the specimens. It is in this case that the number of silver grains produced by the radioactivity in the labelled cell organelle profiles is directly proportional to the number of distintegrations occurring (Downs & Williams , 1978).…”
Section: Theoretical Principle and Basic Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a considerable proportion of the silver grains are formed over cell structures adjoining to those where the disintegration events occurred. This phenomenon known as cross-fire (Williams, , 1977Downs & Williams, 1978) takes place over the junctional regions between neighbouring cell features. Its extent depends on the intracellular organization and the factors governing resolution (Rogers, 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%