2015
DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1061709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise

Abstract: A good agreement has been found between the SRTs and slope and those of other matrix tests. Since sentences are difficult to memorize, the Italian matrix test is suitable for repeated measurements.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
49
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because sentences were randomly generated for each block, no two 10-sentence blocks were (theoretically) the same within a run, across runs, and across subjects. The slopes of the sigmoid functions fit to the data in Figure 4 were comparable to those reported in Hochmuth et al (2012), but shallower than in Puglisi et al (2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Because sentences were randomly generated for each block, no two 10-sentence blocks were (theoretically) the same within a run, across runs, and across subjects. The slopes of the sigmoid functions fit to the data in Figure 4 were comparable to those reported in Hochmuth et al (2012), but shallower than in Puglisi et al (2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Unfavorable acoustics in classroom determines challenging environments for children, who are more sensitive than adults or older peers to noise and reverberation when performing tasks that involve listening comprehension and non-auditory features such as short-term memory, reading, and writing (Klatte et al, 2013). As a result, BA brings lower speech intelligibility scores, mostly for first graders (Astolfi et al, 2012b;Prodi et al, 2013;Puglisi et al, 2015b); degradation of the accuracy in identifying and producing newly learned words (Riley and McGregor, 2012); reduced reading speed of second graders (Puglisi et al, 2018); and lower scores in the standardized tests of literacy, mathematics, and science for pupils aged 7-11 years (Shield and Dockrell, 2008).…”
Section: Effect Of Bad Classroom Acoustics On Learning Attainments Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The background noise was presented at 65 dB SPL, whereas the speech level was adaptively adjusted depending on the subjects' response to obtain the S/N ratio at which the percent word score was 50%. Two lists of 30 sentences, having a fixed syntactic structure, were generated by picking up items from a 105-word base matrix 14 . Before testing, a training list was applied.…”
Section: Experimental Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%