“…Despite their ability to provide near real-time responses, low cost, low power supply requirements, and low weight and size, these sensors usually have limits of detection on the order of ppmv, and their applications in real-world scenarios are not well-grounded due to the lack of field validation and calibration . Additionally, MOX-based sensors are highly affected by changes in relative humidity. , On the other hand, gas sensors based on chemical methods that rely on a chemical collection of the analyte by a renewable reagent solution have been seen as an excellent alternative for gas sensing. , Chemical methods that measure an optical phenomenon as a result of the interaction between the reagent and the analyte have been adapted in many gas-sensing configurations with low limits of detection (i.e., ppbv range), high selectivity, easiness of use, low volume of reagent, fast response times, and low cost. – Moreover, due to the high availability of optoelectronic components and with the advent of 3D printing technology, the construction of small, inexpensive, versatile, low-energy consumption, and dedicated platforms that can be connected with Internet of Things (IoT) devices to control, collect and transmit data has been facilitated. – …”