2022 IEEE International Conference on Communication, Networks and Satellite (COMNETSAT) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/comnetsat56033.2022.9994388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An IoT-Based System for Water Quality Monitoring and Notification System of Aquaculture Prawn Pond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the sensors should meet the specific criteria for ocean measurements. To ensure this instrument can effectively operate over long periods, the sensors were chosen based on the previous developments by [ 28 , 37 ]. Most recent publications on the data collected from these sensors show that they meet the necessary quality and reliability standards for the intended purpose [ 18 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the sensors should meet the specific criteria for ocean measurements. To ensure this instrument can effectively operate over long periods, the sensors were chosen based on the previous developments by [ 28 , 37 ]. Most recent publications on the data collected from these sensors show that they meet the necessary quality and reliability standards for the intended purpose [ 18 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding error analysis, Huan et al [18] point to a relative error of 0.21%, while the work of Nandakumar et al [26] indicate a relative error of 3.20% for the DFRobot SEN 0237-A sensor and Adriman et al [2] describe a relative error of 3.15% for an unidentified low-cost sensor. In this sense, it should be noted that the sensors tested in this work do not differ from the results presented in the literature.…”
Section: Experiments With Ph Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the work of [7], a systematic review of the literature analyzed 142 papers to determine which LCS have been used for remote water quality monitoring and how they performed in the measurements. One of the findings was that only a few papers compared LCS with reference devices [2,6,18,28,30]. In most published work, the capabilities and limitations of the sensors have not been thoroughly investigated to ensure that they meet the data quality requirements for the intended applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies include the development of a water condition monitoring device for fish farming using Arduino [23], [24] through a web interface [25]- [29] Another study focused on monitoring shrimp pond water conditions using an Android mobile application [30]- [34] based on WSN [35]- [41]. Furthermore, research on monitoring temperature and pH levels in vannamei shrimp pond water [7] levels, and water height monitoring employed ultrasonic technology and the ESP32 microcontroller for data processing, with Wi-Fi technology for data transmission to a cloud server [6], [42]. Supporting studies encompass the application of IoT technology in agricultural waste management [43] and soil humidity monitoring in chili cultivation [44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%