2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b00135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Ionophore for High Lithium Loading and Selective Capture from Brine

Abstract: The continuous demand and uneven dispersal of natural mineral resources of lithium with a low recycling rate of lithium commodities have forced researchers to look for alternative resources like geothermal brine, brackish brines, and sea brines. But selective lithium-ion extraction and even lithium-ion binding from these aqueous systems is a recognized challenge due to very high hydration energy and the coexistence of other like metal ions but appealing due to economic benefits. Therefore, the designed synthes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To understand the metal–TSIL binding interactions, the nonlinear regression approach was made to derive more reliable binding parameters. Considering the bidentate nature of TSILs, two probable binding models (2:1 and 1:1) were fitted using fluorescence titration data by the BindFit v0.5 program from supramolecular.org, an open-access program. Out of the two binding models, the 2:1 model is prominent for most of the metal ions except Pd 2+ , which shows a 1:1 fit as evident from the covfit (covariance of the fit, is a measure of the quality of fit) and residual plots . The probable host–guest binding models (Figure S21) with the binding constants, and their links are summarized in Tables S2 and S3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the metal–TSIL binding interactions, the nonlinear regression approach was made to derive more reliable binding parameters. Considering the bidentate nature of TSILs, two probable binding models (2:1 and 1:1) were fitted using fluorescence titration data by the BindFit v0.5 program from supramolecular.org, an open-access program. Out of the two binding models, the 2:1 model is prominent for most of the metal ions except Pd 2+ , which shows a 1:1 fit as evident from the covfit (covariance of the fit, is a measure of the quality of fit) and residual plots . The probable host–guest binding models (Figure S21) with the binding constants, and their links are summarized in Tables S2 and S3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 5d , 12 ] Due to its high hydration energy, Li + tends to be less readily extracted than other alkali metal ions. [ 6b , 13 ] Furthermore, very basic conditions (pH>11) are generally required for extraction from aqueous solution. [ 5b , 12c ] Macrocyclic receptors, particular crown‐4 derivatives are also selective for lithium ions and have been widely investigated by SLE (Scheme 1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these approaches have shown some degree of success for selective extraction of lithium from simple solutions. Other ethers have also been shown to have selective chemistry with lithium [197,198].…”
Section: Compoundmentioning
confidence: 99%