2017
DOI: 10.1177/0308518x17739007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An invitation to the dark side of economic geography

Abstract: This exchange urges economic geographers working within several major extant schools of thought to pay greater attention to uneven economic development in general and the dark side of the economic geographies in particular.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Research on evolutionary economic geography has been criticised for not paying enough attention to the societal dimension of economic development, such as how economic growth, innovation, or other performance measurements relate to wealth distribution and social inequality. Much research takes a rather uncritical approach towards the societal advantages that may arise from industrial development, instead of acknowledging potentially problematic aspects and negative externalities (Phelps et al, 2017). For instance, a strong relationship between the growth of the larger KIBS sector and rising socio-economic inequality has been found in the Norwegian capital-city region (Wessel, 2013).…”
Section: Limitations and Implications For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on evolutionary economic geography has been criticised for not paying enough attention to the societal dimension of economic development, such as how economic growth, innovation, or other performance measurements relate to wealth distribution and social inequality. Much research takes a rather uncritical approach towards the societal advantages that may arise from industrial development, instead of acknowledging potentially problematic aspects and negative externalities (Phelps et al, 2017). For instance, a strong relationship between the growth of the larger KIBS sector and rising socio-economic inequality has been found in the Norwegian capital-city region (Wessel, 2013).…”
Section: Limitations and Implications For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is to say, paradoxically, e‐commerce may have both positive and negative effects on specialized markets. Thus, it is of great urgency to examine what the “dark‐side” impact of e‐commerce on conventional specialized markets is (Phelps, Atienza, & Arias, 2018). More importantly, it is worthwhile for scholars to explore how e‐commerce co‐evolves with offline market platforms and their related economies over time and space, and what the theoretical meaning of E‐commerce is for economic geography (Wei et al., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A normative turn in regional innovation policy discourses has equally been motivated by perceived limitations of regional innovation system approaches to address the challenges of regional economic restructuring (Tödtling & Trippl, 2018). Much of the regional innovation policy literature has been seen as too focussed on technological innovation (Jeannerat & Crevoisier, 2016) and biased towards successful agglomerations (Eder, 2018), implicitly assuming that innovation and diversification are positive per se (Phelps, Atienza, & Arias, 2018). Increasing within-country inequalities and growing discontent amongst places left behind by globalization (Rodríguez-Pose, 2018) have forced a debate around balancing economic gains from innovation with greater territorial and social equity (Iammarino, Rodríguez-Pose, & Storper, 2018;Barca, 2009).…”
Section: Regional Innovation Policies For Transformative Changementioning
confidence: 99%