2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.orthres.2005.06.003.1100230623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation to examine the inter-tester and intra-tester reliability of the Rolimeter® knee tester, and its sensitivity in identifying knee joint laxity

Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the Rolimeter@ knee tester (Aircast@, Europe) as reliable and clinically sensitive tool for identifying and quantifying knee joint laxity utilising a sample of both known ACLD and normal knees.Methods: Thirty matched subjects (1 5 known ACLD and 15 normal subjects) were tested for knee joint laxity using the Polimeterm. Each subject was measured at both 90" and 30" of knee flexion, by each of the six investigators. This was then repeated again by all six invest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(13 reference statements)
2
11
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to physical examination test such as the Lachman test, pivot shift test and anterior drawer test, they are objective [24]. Physical examination tests without instruments are largely dependent on the examiner and therefore less reliable [25][26][27][28][29][30]. A very active issue is the quest for a way to objectify the pivot shift test, as currently no objective evaluation tool exists to measure rotational stability of the knee [31][32][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrary to physical examination test such as the Lachman test, pivot shift test and anterior drawer test, they are objective [24]. Physical examination tests without instruments are largely dependent on the examiner and therefore less reliable [25][26][27][28][29][30]. A very active issue is the quest for a way to objectify the pivot shift test, as currently no objective evaluation tool exists to measure rotational stability of the knee [31][32][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…elite athletes vs. weekend warriors vs. sedentary individuals). Furthermore, the large sample of different observers amongst the different studies is a potential source for heterogeneity [3, 26, 27, 29, 40, 41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the Rolimeter instrument is used to determine the anterior–posterior laxity of the TKA knee. Several studies have shown the rolimeter to be a valid and reliable testing device for the anterior–posterior translation of the knee joint [5, 11, 13] in the 90° as well as the 30° of knee flexion [6] with no significant difference between Rolimeter measurements compared to other testing devices [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hatcher et al found interrater reliability of 0.91-0.95 by a range of skill levels [56]. Muellner found reliability of 0.71-0.90 in experienced testers, but worse in novices [57].…”
Section: Rolimetermentioning
confidence: 99%