2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation on the use of lean asphalt as an alternative base material in asphalt pavements by means of laboratory testing, life cycle assessment, and life cycle cost analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vesicular volcanic aggregates, due to their high porosity, require longer heating time to completely dry out their moisture, which means an additional 0.7 L of fuel per metric ton for each increase by 1% in moisture, consuming 5.1 L of additional fuel per metric ton compared to mixtures with conventional low-porosity aggregates. A conventional asphalt concrete mixture with neat bitumen 35/50 and limestone aggregate involves approximately 271.1 MJ/metric ton of fuel (natural gas) [38]. Assuming the linear relationship between energy consumption and manufacturing temperature above the water vaporization temperature (Figure 8a), the RHMA mixture accounts for an increase in fuel consumption of 7.1% over the HMA.…”
Section: Energy Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vesicular volcanic aggregates, due to their high porosity, require longer heating time to completely dry out their moisture, which means an additional 0.7 L of fuel per metric ton for each increase by 1% in moisture, consuming 5.1 L of additional fuel per metric ton compared to mixtures with conventional low-porosity aggregates. A conventional asphalt concrete mixture with neat bitumen 35/50 and limestone aggregate involves approximately 271.1 MJ/metric ton of fuel (natural gas) [38]. Assuming the linear relationship between energy consumption and manufacturing temperature above the water vaporization temperature (Figure 8a), the RHMA mixture accounts for an increase in fuel consumption of 7.1% over the HMA.…”
Section: Energy Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…compared to mixtures with conventional low-porosity aggregates. A conventional asphalt concrete mixture with neat bitumen 35/50 and limestone aggregate involves approximately 271.1 MJ/metric ton of fuel (natural gas) [38]. Assuming the linear relationship between energy consumption and manufacturing temperature above the water vaporization temperature (Figure 8a), the RHMA mixture accounts for an increase in fuel consumption of 7.1% over the HMA.…”
Section: Energy Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%