2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2008.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation on the most important influencing parameters regarding the selection of the proper catalysts for Claus SRU converters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This leads to a higher equilibrium conversion because the Claus reaction is exothermic. Typically, COS and CS 2 are also hydrolyzed in the first catalytic converter according to the following exothermic reactions [2]:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This leads to a higher equilibrium conversion because the Claus reaction is exothermic. Typically, COS and CS 2 are also hydrolyzed in the first catalytic converter according to the following exothermic reactions [2]:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrogen sulfide is present in the industrial world chiefly as an undesirable by-product of gas processing [2]. Different processes are used for recovery of sulfur from H 2 S but the most widely used is the Claus process 1) [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are some reheating principles that should be considered to optimize the Claus unit and maximize recovery of sulfur. The catalytic reactor output stream temperatures should be (a) 13–17 K higher than the outlet stream dew points, (b) low enough to maximize hydrogen sulfide conversion according to the equilibrium concepts, and (c) high enough for hydrolysis of COS and CS 2 in the first catalytic reactor …”
Section: Process Description Specification and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several variations of the basic Claus process have been developed to handle a wide range of feed gas compositions (ZareNezhad, 2009). Some of these are shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%