2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.06.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation of the usability of sound recognition for source separation of packaging wastes in reverse vending machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As we can see in the verification result, we were able to recover the average identification rate to about 20% higher than that of the conventional MFCC. It was confirmed that steel cans and aluminum could be clearly distinguished, which was not clearly mentioned in the results of Korucu et al [27]. As our proposal only uses an inexpensive condenser microphone for the classification, the system is simpler and more cost-effective than Korucu's prototype.…”
Section: Evaluation Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As we can see in the verification result, we were able to recover the average identification rate to about 20% higher than that of the conventional MFCC. It was confirmed that steel cans and aluminum could be clearly distinguished, which was not clearly mentioned in the results of Korucu et al [27]. As our proposal only uses an inexpensive condenser microphone for the classification, the system is simpler and more cost-effective than Korucu's prototype.…”
Section: Evaluation Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Korucu et al [27] classify recycling wastes into four cate-gories: metal, plastic, glass, and cardboard, using the free-falling sound. They have set up a use case to collect what was sold on a vending machine, so cardboards are included in the classification.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para una precisión final de sonido y tamaño de un 88,6%, con lo cual se demostró el alto rendimiento que esta implementación puede aportar en el proceso. (Korucu et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…PET bottles were manually separated and weighted according to six defined volume ranges (starting from below 0.39 l to more than 2.26 l). This information is important to determine the size of the inlet and the dimensions of the collection containers or reverse vending machines, among other uses (Korucu et al, 2016). Because PET bottles are commonly used as for different beverages (Welle, 2011), their distribution based on the type of product for which they were used was also analysed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%