An investigation of the test-retest reliability of the stroop colorword test across two intervals

Franzen, Michael D.; Tishelman, Amy C.; Sharp, Brian; Friedman, Alice G.

doi:10.1093/arclin/2.3.265

Cited by 56 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For all analyses, random effects were used to calculate Cohen's ds for each of the outcome measures to account for the variation Adaptive programs are programs that are based on the participant's performance and match the difficulty, whereas non-adaptive programs are administered at the same difficulty regardless of the participant's performance. Process-based programs involved repeated drills that were aimed at broad cognitive domains Test-retest reliability range of r = .671 to 0.831 (Franzen et al 1987). …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Commercially Available Computerized Cognitive Training Among Older Adults

Tetlow

Edwards

2017

J Cogn Enhanc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Researchers have explored a variety of interventions to improve cognition among older adults. One of which is computerized cognitive training programs. The number of commercially available, cognitive training programs has increased greatly, but scientists debate their value. The purposes of this systematic literature review and meta-analysis were to (1) evaluate the efficacy of commercially available, computerized cognitive training programs to improve cognition in older adults and (2) examine far transfer of training to untrained tasks relevant to everyday functioning. Articles were reviewed if the study (a) included a sample of adults aged 55 and older, (b) used a commercially available, computerized cognitive training program, (c) was a randomized controlled trial, (d) measured cognition as an outcome, and (e) included a sample that was free from health conditions affecting cognitive function (e.g., cancer, stroke, psychiatric conditions, or traumatic brain injury). Effect sizes were calculated using random effect models to determine cognitive training effects for various cognitive domains and far transfer tasks. There were significant small to medium training effects for the cognitive domains of attention (d = 0.651, p < .001), processing speed (d = 0.294, p = .002), and visuospatial memory (d = 0.252, p = 0.016). There was also evidence of far transfer to selfreported measures of everyday function (d = 0.277, p < 0.001). Commercially available computerized cognitive training programs may improve certain cognitive abilities among older adults, who also report improvement on tasks relevant to their everyday lives.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Commercially Available Computerized Cognitive Training Among Older Adults

Tetlow

Edwards

2017

J Cogn Enhanc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Accuracy and completion time are the indices by which performance is evaluated. The Stroop has been shown to have good test–retest reliability [Franzen, Tishelman, Sharp, & Friedman, ].…”

Section: Method—studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Features of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and impairments on neuropsychological, tests of attention have been documented in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). To date, there has been a lack of research comparing attention in adults with ASD and adults with ADHD. In study 1, 31 adults with ASD and average intellectual function completed self-report measures of ADHD symptoms. These were compared with self-report measures of ADHD symptoms in 38 adults with ADHD and 29 general population controls. In study 2, 28 adults with a diagnosis of ASD were compared with an age- and intelligence quotient-matched sample of 28 adults with ADHD across a range of measures of attention. Study 1 showed that 36.7% of adults with ASD met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV criteria for current ADHD "caseness" (Barkley Current self-report scores questionnaire). Those with a diagnosis of pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified were most likely to describe ADHD symptoms. The ASD group differed significantly from both the ADHD and control groups on total and individual symptom self-report scores. On neuropsychological testing, adults with ASD and ADHD showed comparable performance on tests of selective attention. Significant group differences were seen on measures of attentional switching; adults with ADHD were significantly faster and more inaccurate, and individuals with Asperger's syndrome showed a significantly slower and more accurate response style. Self-reported rates of ADHD among adults with ASD are significantly higher than in the general adult population and may be underdiagnosed. Adults with ASD have attentional difficulties on some neuropsychological measures.

show abstract

“…The average response accuracy in this study was above 98% for each child. The reported testretest reliability of the task was approximately .70 (Franzen, Tishelman, Sharp, & Friedman, 1987).…”

Section: Word Inhibitionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Phonological storage and executive function deficits in children with mathematics difficulties

Peng

Sun

et al. 2012

Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An investigation of the test-retest reliability of the stroop colorword test across two intervals

Cited by 56 publications

References 0 publications

Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Commercially Available Computerized Cognitive Training Among Older Adults

Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Commercially Available Computerized Cognitive Training Among Older Adults

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Phonological storage and executive function deficits in children with mathematics difficulties

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About