2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation of the limits of phosphorus removal in wetlands: a mesocosm study of a shallow periphyton-dominated treatment system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
16
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The treatment wetlands in this study appear to be retained phosphate phosphorus (total phosphorus was not measured in this study) near a sustainable rate, according to that range, although it is conceivable that tropical systems could be more effective than the temperate zone estimates reported above. One of the few recent tropical/subtropical studies reported considerably lower phosphorus retention compared to this study; total phosphorus uptake of experimental mesocosm-scale wetlands in Florida was only 0.32 g P m −2 year −1 (DeBusk et al, 2004).…”
Section: Hydraulic Loading and Nutrient Retention Ratesmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…The treatment wetlands in this study appear to be retained phosphate phosphorus (total phosphorus was not measured in this study) near a sustainable rate, according to that range, although it is conceivable that tropical systems could be more effective than the temperate zone estimates reported above. One of the few recent tropical/subtropical studies reported considerably lower phosphorus retention compared to this study; total phosphorus uptake of experimental mesocosm-scale wetlands in Florida was only 0.32 g P m −2 year −1 (DeBusk et al, 2004).…”
Section: Hydraulic Loading and Nutrient Retention Ratesmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…In this sense, the ability of CWs to remove phosphorus is limited when compared to the nitrogen removal capacity (DeBusK et al, 2004) since no permanent phosphorus loss is observed in these systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Verifica-se na Tabela 5 que não houve diferença significativa na remoção de potássio entre os SACs vegetados (SAC 2 e SAC 3 ) e não vegetados (SAC 1 ), diferentemente do que foi observado por Matos et al (2010a) elemento fósforo e substâncias tóxicas das águas residuárias, tanto pela adsorção, quando o material é utilizado como material suporte, quanto pela precipitação de formas químicas estáveis de fosfato (DeBUSK et al, 2004;TANAKA et al, 2007;KAASIK et al, 2008). pode ter ocorrido nos SACs operados neste experimento e contribuído para a formação da estruvita, reduzindo as concentrações de P, magnésio e amônio efluentes dos SACs.…”
Section: Remoção De Potássio Sódio Cálcio E Magnésiounclassified