2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00131-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation of the interaction between cognitive style and context reinstatement on the memory performance of eyewitnesses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
20
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The tendency for memory enhancement to be more robust with free recall fits in with some other findings using conventional hypnosis procedures (Erdelyi, 1994), as well as Focused Meditation (Wagstaff, Brunas-Wagstaff, Knapton, et al, 2004) and context reinstatement procedures (Emmett et al, 2003). Although the reasons for this remain unclear, perhaps the most simple explanation is that, when retrieving information by free recall, the participant potentially has available all the information he or she has encoded.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The tendency for memory enhancement to be more robust with free recall fits in with some other findings using conventional hypnosis procedures (Erdelyi, 1994), as well as Focused Meditation (Wagstaff, Brunas-Wagstaff, Knapton, et al, 2004) and context reinstatement procedures (Emmett et al, 2003). Although the reasons for this remain unclear, perhaps the most simple explanation is that, when retrieving information by free recall, the participant potentially has available all the information he or she has encoded.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…For example, a variety of evidence suggests that, when used by itself, mental context reinstatement, a component of the original Cognitive Interview, can be particularly effective (Cutler, Penrod, & Martens, 1987;Emmett, Clifford, & Gwyer, 2003;Hammond, Wagstaff, & Cole, 2006;Malpass & Devine, 1981;Smith & Vela, 2001). Indeed, context reinstatement along with "report everything" are now recognized as the most effective mnemonic components of the Cognitive Interview (Davis, McMahon, & Greenwood, 2005;Milne & Bull, 2002;Wilcock, Bull, & Vrij, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it is not immediately obvious why Focused Meditation, with or without eye-closure, works most reliably with free recall. Interestingly the evidence also suggests that the positive effects of context reinstatement are most reliably demonstrated with free recall (Emmett et al 2003), suggesting that there may be a common explanation. One possibility might be that, when retrieving information by free recall, the participant potentially has available all the information he or she has encoded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For example, in a famous experiment scuba divers who memorized a list of words either on land or under water were most accurate, recalling 40% more information when tested in the same environment they originally learned the information (Godden & Baddeley, 1975). Many subsequent studies have confirmed that the addition of similar contextual cues at retrieval increases the quantity of accurate information recalled without an accompanying increase in inaccurate information (e.g., Davis, McMahon, & Greenwood, 2005;Emmett, Clifford, & Gwyer, 2003;Milne & Bull, 2002).…”
Section: Interviewer's Effect On Witness Memory -Working Alliance Andmentioning
confidence: 99%