2013
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.864-867.1233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Investigation of the Efficiency of Fulvic Acid and Straw Water Amendments for Arsenic Uptake from Groundwater by <i>Vetiveria zizanioides</i>

Abstract: The aim of the research was to investigate the efficiency of fulvic acid or straw water as an alternate amendment to chelating agents, to enhance the uptake of arsenic from groundwater by Vetiveria zizanioides. Fulvic acid and straw water were applied separately to arsenic-contaminated groundwater at different concentrations (0.1% and 0.01%). It was found that when the higher concentration (0.1%) of straw water was added to the groundwater solution, the efficiency of arsenic accumulation by roots was increased… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although prevention of the formation and migration of AMD from its source is generally the preferred option, this approach may not be feasible at many mining sites, and thus, collection, treatment, and subsequent discharge of the mine waters may be required [16]. Both biological [22,23] and abiotic [24][25][26] processes or techniques are able to mitigate arsenic in AMD, including As (III) and As(V). Because As(III) exhibits higher toxicity and lower affinity for environmental adsorbents, e.g., Fe(hyd)oxides, than does As(V), the conversion of As(III) to As(V) is considered a key strategy in curtailing arsenic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although prevention of the formation and migration of AMD from its source is generally the preferred option, this approach may not be feasible at many mining sites, and thus, collection, treatment, and subsequent discharge of the mine waters may be required [16]. Both biological [22,23] and abiotic [24][25][26] processes or techniques are able to mitigate arsenic in AMD, including As (III) and As(V). Because As(III) exhibits higher toxicity and lower affinity for environmental adsorbents, e.g., Fe(hyd)oxides, than does As(V), the conversion of As(III) to As(V) is considered a key strategy in curtailing arsenic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%