SAE Technical Paper Series 1996
DOI: 10.4271/960253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Investigation of the Effect of Differing Filter Face Velocities on Particulate Mass Weight from Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Filtration efficiency range of the Pallflex ® TX40HI20 filter has been reported to be 92.6-99.99 % for a particle diameter range 35-1000 nm (Willeke and Baron, 1993). Guerrieri et al (1996) investigated the effects of filter face velocity on particulate mass from heavy-duty diesel engines and suggested that for the range 40 to 100 cm/sec, filter face velocity should exhibit little, if any, influence on a collected particulate mass. During TPM sampling for this study, the flow rate was maintained in the recommended range.…”
Section: Gaseous Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filtration efficiency range of the Pallflex ® TX40HI20 filter has been reported to be 92.6-99.99 % for a particle diameter range 35-1000 nm (Willeke and Baron, 1993). Guerrieri et al (1996) investigated the effects of filter face velocity on particulate mass from heavy-duty diesel engines and suggested that for the range 40 to 100 cm/sec, filter face velocity should exhibit little, if any, influence on a collected particulate mass. During TPM sampling for this study, the flow rate was maintained in the recommended range.…”
Section: Gaseous Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filtration efficiency for the Pallflex TX40H120WW was reported as 92.6-99.99% for particle diameter range of 35-1000 nm (Willeke and Baron, 1993). Guerrieri et al (1996) investigated filter face velocity effects on particulate mass from heavy-duty diesel engines and suggested that a filter face velocity range between 40 to 100 cm/sec would exhibit little, if any, influence on collected particulate mass. Flow rates were kept within the range of 35 to 45 cm/sec and dilution ratios were held very near a constant 12:1 ratio for this study.…”
Section: Sampling and Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%