2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation of the attributes of walkable environments from the perspective of seniors in Montreal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, despite a growing interest, most studies tend to involve a priori assumed relationships between the built environment and walking, with the application of statistical regression models (e.g. negative binomial regression (Cao et al, 2010), logistic regression (Barnes et al, 2016), joint discrete-continuous model (Moniruzzaman and Páez, 2016), and structural equation models (Leung et al, 2018)). In fact, their relationship may exist in a complicated non-linear manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite a growing interest, most studies tend to involve a priori assumed relationships between the built environment and walking, with the application of statistical regression models (e.g. negative binomial regression (Cao et al, 2010), logistic regression (Barnes et al, 2016), joint discrete-continuous model (Moniruzzaman and Páez, 2016), and structural equation models (Leung et al, 2018)). In fact, their relationship may exist in a complicated non-linear manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of living, social, and entertainment needs of older adults can be satisfied in the vicinity of their homes. Different facilities have become physically or spatially adjacent because of the high level of land use mixture [ 10 ], which makes walking or cycling become attractive and feasible travel options, especially for older adults [ 10 , 57 , 83 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies, such as those set out below, have looked at walkability in a wider sense and have focused on all factors that affect the walkability of an area and the perception of a pedestrian environment by users (Galanis and Eliou, 2011;Shumi et al, 2015;Christiansen et al, 2014;Leslie et al, 2005;Ruiz-Padillo et al, 2018). Several researchers have developed tools and methodologies that can reproduce the choices that pedestrians face during their travel from an origin to a destination (Kelly et al, 2011;Ariffin and Zahari, 2013;Moniruzzaman and Pàez, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pedestrian needs and the manner in which an urban environment is able to respond to these needs depend on several factors (Amoroso et al, 2012), such as the lifestyle factors (age, gender, physical and mental abilities, level of education, state of employment, car ownership, and place of residence), climate and landscape (temperature, rain, humidity, wind, obstacles, and slope), land use (points of interest, street furniture, location of schools, and workplaces), and the characteristics of a transportation system (access to public transport, cost, and inter-modality). For these reasons, some audits and questionnaires have been applied to determine what influences walkability factors have on the perception of a pedestrian environment and the propensity to walk based on specific categories of pedestrians, namely school-aged children (Christiansen et al, 2014), elderly people (Moniruzzaman and Pàez, 2016), and people with physical disabilities. Aghaabbasi et al (2018) identified some critical issues of the developed auditing tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%