2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2007.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation of secondary ion yield enhancement using Bin2+ (n=1, 3, 5) primary ions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with previous reports [28,30,[35][36][37], the performances of Bi 3 + and Bi 3 ++ were found to be similar (for example, Figure 3d and e). Different pulse widths were, however, required to obtain similar currents: 160 ns for the Bi 3 + beam and 250 ns for the Bi 3 ++ beam at the maximum current.…”
Section: Bi 3 + or Bi 3 ++supporting
confidence: 93%
“…In agreement with previous reports [28,30,[35][36][37], the performances of Bi 3 + and Bi 3 ++ were found to be similar (for example, Figure 3d and e). Different pulse widths were, however, required to obtain similar currents: 160 ns for the Bi 3 + beam and 250 ns for the Bi 3 ++ beam at the maximum current.…”
Section: Bi 3 + or Bi 3 ++supporting
confidence: 93%
“…The ability to analyze this material in substance enables one to study the enhancement in secondary ion yield without interferences from substrate wafers, such as silicon, aluminium and silver, and from different sample preparation conditions. [13] Experimental 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide [bmim][NTf 2 ] (Scheme 1) was prepared by an established synthetic method [20] and was used after drying for several hours at approximately 10 −6 mbar. The spectra were obtained from neat ionic liquids in a customized molybdenum sample holder to ensure a smooth surface so as to obtain good spectra (i.e.…”
Section: ++mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14] The difference between the measured ion currents was at maximum ±5%, which is in good agreement with previously published data. [12,13,14] Typical operation conditions and beam performance are summarized in Table 4. Primary ion energy was 25 keV for single charged ion clusters, and 50 keV for double charged ion clusters.…”
Section: ++mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[20,21] The difference between the measured ion currents was at maximum ±5% which is in good agreement to previously published data. [20,22,23] and a primary ion energy of 25 keV for single charged ion clusters and 50 keV for double charged ion clusters. For each measurement the primary ion dose density was set to 1 × 10 10 ions cm −2 ensuring static conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%