2011
DOI: 10.5194/acp-11-5719-2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation of methods for injecting emissions from boreal wildfires using WRF-Chem during ARCTAS

Abstract: One of the most important aspects of simulating wildfire plume transport is the height at which emissions are injected. WRF-Chem contains an integrated one-dimensional plume rise model to determine the appropriate injection layer. The plume rise model accounts for thermal buoyancy associated with fires and local atmospheric stability. This paper describes a case study of a 10 day period during the Spring phase of ARCTAS. It compares results from the plume model against those of two more traditional injection m… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
1
62
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A daily mean is calculated over each day (LT) and averaged over plume top and bottom to obtain a quantity comparable to GFASv1.2 plume height derivations. These are namely the height of maximum injection derived by a later version of the plume rise model within C-IFS (CompositionIntegrated Forecasting System) and the plume top estimated after a method by Sofiev et al (2012). In comparison to the plume heights obtained by simulation VARHEIGHT the GFAS plume heights do not have a diurnal cycle.…”
Section: Plume Heightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A daily mean is calculated over each day (LT) and averaged over plume top and bottom to obtain a quantity comparable to GFASv1.2 plume height derivations. These are namely the height of maximum injection derived by a later version of the plume rise model within C-IFS (CompositionIntegrated Forecasting System) and the plume top estimated after a method by Sofiev et al (2012). In comparison to the plume heights obtained by simulation VARHEIGHT the GFAS plume heights do not have a diurnal cycle.…”
Section: Plume Heightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Including a one-dimensional, subgrid-scale plume rise model into an existing chemistry and transportation model has the potential to enhance the representation of fire emissions in model simulations (Freitas et al, 2007;Sessions et al, 2011). The one-dimensional model calculates the upper and lower bounds of the injection layer depending on meteorological conditions, fire size, and fire intensity for every fire location.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Guan et al (2010) found a linear relationship between coincident OMI AAI and CALIOP plume height for young biomass burning plumes, allowing the identification of high-altitude plumes in the multi-decadal TOMS and OMI AAI data, and hence making it possible to construct a data set for validating global fire plume heights in chemistry transport models. These associations from satellite products, begin to give the modeling community the information they need to develop and refine plume rises models, so smoke from fires can be placed at the correct altitude within the model, thus improving aerosol transport modeling (Sessions et al, 2011;Val Martin et al, in press). Injection heights have been characterized by satellite also for dust plumes Yumimoto et al, 2009) and volcanic plumes (Haywood et al, 2010;Scollo et al, 2010).…”
Section: Source Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%