1985
DOI: 10.1002/sce.3730690512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation of high school biology textbooks as sources of misconceptions and difficulties in genetics and some suggestions for teaching genetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
67
0
31

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
67
0
31
Order By: Relevance
“…The emergent sense from many science education scholars is that the plethora of representations in today's textbooks is problematic and perhaps even counterproductive to the learning of scientific ideas (e.g., Barrow, 1990;Cho, Kahle, & Nordland, 1985;Kikas, 1998;Stern & Roseman, 2004). The aim of this article is to examine why that perception has emerged.…”
Section: Science Textbooksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emergent sense from many science education scholars is that the plethora of representations in today's textbooks is problematic and perhaps even counterproductive to the learning of scientific ideas (e.g., Barrow, 1990;Cho, Kahle, & Nordland, 1985;Kikas, 1998;Stern & Roseman, 2004). The aim of this article is to examine why that perception has emerged.…”
Section: Science Textbooksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students' views and explanations of science concepts may differ from those generally accepted by the scientists. Alternative views were given in various terms including "children science" [6, 7], "alternative frameworks" [8, 9], "naive beliefs" [10], "preconceptions" [11], and "misconceptions" [12].Over the last two decades, a large number of studies has been conducted on misconceptions in science [3, 4,11,[13][14][15][16]. Students' interpretations of observed phenomena and information obtained from school experiences were sometimes found to be scientifically incorrect and significantly different from the ideas that their teachers intended to convey.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students' views and explanations of science concepts may differ from those generally accepted by the scientists. Alternative views were given in various terms including "children science" [6, 7], "alternative frameworks" [8, 9], "naive beliefs" [10], "preconceptions" [11], and "misconceptions" [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information formed the basis for the checklists developed to identify and capture the Cho et al 1985), as discussed later. Second, the use of certain 'risk-terms' may cause problems.…”
Section: Sanders and Makotsamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information formed the basis for the checklists developed to identify and capture the manifest and latent errors in the books analysed. Textbooks have been shown to be a source of errors in biology (Cho et al 1985) including evolution-related ones (for example, Jiménez Aleixandre 1994; Rees 2007;Stern 2004), although no systematic analysis of such errors has been done. Several problems have been identified.…”
Section: The Conceptual Framework For the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%