2003
DOI: 10.1080/09709274.2003.11905598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Investigation of Hand Anthropometry of Agricultural Workers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
5
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…UK females (Davies et al, 1980), Hong Kong Chinese females (Courtney and Ng, 1984), Indian agricultural workers (Karunanithi et al, 2001), Western Nigerian rural farm workers (Okunribido, 2000), Eastern Indians (Kar et al, 2003), Central Indian farm workers (Gite and Yadav, 1989), Mexicans (Imrhan and Contreras, 2005), Jordanians (Mandahawi et al, 2008), Bangladesh females , Bangladesh males (Imrhan et al, 2006) and few hand anthropometric dimensions have also measured for Filipino manufacturing workers (Del Prado-Lu, 2007). An effort was made by researchers to study the effects of the differences in anthropometric dimensions between people of India and Western Europe (Gupta et al, 1983;Imrhan et al, 2009;Sen et al, 1977).…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…UK females (Davies et al, 1980), Hong Kong Chinese females (Courtney and Ng, 1984), Indian agricultural workers (Karunanithi et al, 2001), Western Nigerian rural farm workers (Okunribido, 2000), Eastern Indians (Kar et al, 2003), Central Indian farm workers (Gite and Yadav, 1989), Mexicans (Imrhan and Contreras, 2005), Jordanians (Mandahawi et al, 2008), Bangladesh females , Bangladesh males (Imrhan et al, 2006) and few hand anthropometric dimensions have also measured for Filipino manufacturing workers (Del Prado-Lu, 2007). An effort was made by researchers to study the effects of the differences in anthropometric dimensions between people of India and Western Europe (Gupta et al, 1983;Imrhan et al, 2009;Sen et al, 1977).…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Hand breadth 83 (6) 77 (6) 77 (7) 81 (5) 83 (5) IV. CONCLUSION Different body dimensions are compared for various regions in India of male agricultural workers.…”
Section: B Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mismatches of tool dimension and user physical characteristics are the main concerned factors in reducing the worker's efficiency and can cause injuries and musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) [Mandahawi et al, 2008]. So a number of researchers have reported the significance of relevancy of anthropometric data in tool and equipment design [Graves, 1992;Kar et al 2003;Okunribido, 2000]. Anthropometric traits noticeably varies across gender, age, race, geographical locations, nutritional nature and types of work [Oduma et al, 2017].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, data on hand anthropometry of south eastern Nigerian population is non-existent. Some researchers have established differences in anthropometric dimensions among different nationalities evidenced from the relatively large differences in the measured data Okunribido 2000;Kar et al 2003;Gupta et al 1983;Sen, Nag, and Ray 1977). Analysis of few hand anthropometric dimensions obtained from the north eastern region of India showed significant differences from dimensions of male farmers in the central, eastern, southern, and western regions (Dewangan et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Indians (Kar et al 2003), central Indian farm workers (Gite and Yadav 1989), Mexicans (Imrhan and Contreras 2005), Bangladesh females , and Bangladesh males (Imrhan et al 2006). Presently, data on hand anthropometry of south eastern Nigerian population is non-existent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%