In this review I focus on the galactic properties in clusters at z > 0.1−02. The most salient results regarding the evolution in galaxy colors, spectral features and morphologies are discussed.
Blue galaxies: the Butcher-Oemler effectThe Butcher-Oemler effect is the excess of galaxies bluer than the color-magnitude sequence (where most ellipticals/passive galaxies lie) in clusters at z > 0.1 − 0.2 as compared to the richest nearby clusters [1]. Butcher and Oemler were well aware that the fraction of blue galaxies depends on a number of things, including the cluster type, the clustercentric radius considered and the galaxy magnitude limit, as discussed below.Optical versus X-ray cluster selection -The dependence of the blue fraction on the cluster properties is potentially critical, given that selecting different types of clusters at different redshifts could in principle mimic an evolution. For this reason, it is interesting to ask whether optically and X-ray selected samples of clusters reach similar conclusions regarding the Butcher-Oemler effect [2,3]. Based on the CNOC (Canadian Network for Observational Cosmology) X-ray-selected cluster sample, an evolution of the blue fraction with redshift, very similar to the original Butcher-Oemler result, has been confirmed [4,5]. Interestingly, the blue fraction shows no simple trend with cluster X-ray luminosity [2, 3, 6], a point I will discuss later. Richness -How the blue fraction (f B ) depends on cluster richness has been the subject of an extensive study by [7], who found f B to be higher in poor clusters and lower in rich clusters, and to increase with redshift for all types of clusters. It would be important to verify how f B depends on richness using a clustercentric radial limit that varies with the cluster scalelength, instead of the fixed metric radius (0.7 Mpc) adopted by this study, because this choice could induce a spurious trend with richness by sampling different areas in rich and poor clusters [6]. Substructure Possibly the most relevant question of all is how the blue fraction, and the star formation activity in general, depend on cluster substructure, i.e. on the merging/accretion history of the cluster. The exact relation between subcluster merging and blue fraction still needs