An investigation of corporate approaches to sustainability in the US engineering and construction industry

Abstract

Sustainability involves focusing on a project’s impact in three areas: (1) environmental; (2) economical; and (3) societal. In reality, companies’ approaches in the three areas are not evenly distributed. A study of current trends in the US construction industry related to the emerging focus on sustainable construction will be of great value for the engineering and construction industry to recognize the differences in corporate approaches to sustainability, for the sake of team alignment. A random cross‐section of 300 companies, consisting of 150 owner companies, 75 contractor companies and 75 design firms representing a variety of industries, was selected from annual company data assembled by the weekly construction news publication Engineering News Record (ENR). To identify sustainability‐related concepts within the context of these company documents, content analyses and chi‐square statistical analyses were performed on the selected companies’ publicly available annual reports and mission/vision/values statements. The primary objectives are to: (1) identify concepts of sustainability that are currently being emphasized within the US engineering and construction industry, possibly at the expense of other concepts; and (2) develop an understanding of the relationships between various company and industry groups related to the fundamental concepts of sustainable construction.Sustainability, society, economic, environment, content analysis,

Engaging small firms in sustainable supply chains: responsible sourcing practices in the UK construction industry

“…It is about doing the right thing, having the visibility of issues that you have in your supply chain and actually how you manage those". This demonstrates a link with emerging literature on ethics and corporate responsibility in construction, such as Murray and Dainty (2009), Fewings (2009), Jones et al (2010 and Loosemore and Phua (2011). One of the survey respondents said RS was all about: "showing how responsible we are... it is our duty to give something back and be advocates for the correct procurement of materials".…”

A comparative study of sustainability management education in China and the USA

“…The research design followed previous content analyses (Jones, Shan, and Goodrum 2010;Wu et al 2010). Content analysis is a systemic, objective, quantitative research method that can measure variables as they naturally occur, without any manipulation of the independent variables (Neuendorf 2002).…”

Corporate Responsibility Practices in Engineering Consultancies

“…This important gap in research was first recognised by Wilkinson et al (2004), but a much smaller body of work exists on the role of CR in the construction industry (e.g. Jones et al, 2010;Myers, 2005;Brown et al, 2009;Murray andDainty, 2009 andPetrovic-Lazarevic, 2004) , and very little attention has been paid to consultants.…”

“…Myers (2005); Jones et al (2010). Myers (2005) claims it is suitable because it is "...objective, consistent and repeatable..." and has some history in its use in both the construction sector (Drexer and Larson, 2000;Yu et al, 2006), the sustainability arena (UNEP 2000;2002;WWF, 2004;and Sustainability et al, 2004) and corporate responsibility (Unerman, 1999;Milne and Adler 1999).…”