2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2011.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation of a tactical cargo aircraft aft body drag reduction based on CFD analysis and wind tunnel tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pressure variations on the Tecnam P2012 are shown in figure 2. The Results obtained were used for the final design of the aircraft Masoud Mirzaei et al [14] computed the drag due to the aft body of a cargo aircraft. A scaled modified model of the passenger jet was subjected to streams of air in a single return wind tunnel at angles of attack between -10 to 20 degrees.…”
Section: Experimental Analysis Of Aircraft Fuselagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pressure variations on the Tecnam P2012 are shown in figure 2. The Results obtained were used for the final design of the aircraft Masoud Mirzaei et al [14] computed the drag due to the aft body of a cargo aircraft. A scaled modified model of the passenger jet was subjected to streams of air in a single return wind tunnel at angles of attack between -10 to 20 degrees.…”
Section: Experimental Analysis Of Aircraft Fuselagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…After checking the grid, the implicit solver based on density is selected, because it is more suitable for compressible flow problems and has a faster convergence. Since the airflow around the aircraft body experiences both laminar and turbulent regimes, transition regions and separation points are strongly affected by turbulence modeling in the CFD (computational fluid dynamics) simulations [ 14 ]. So, in this paper, the flow field is turbulent, the turbulence model is more appropriate to solve such problems as near wall flow problems, and is good at solving out the boundary layer problem with an adverse pressure gradient.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Of Wing Flow Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, in this paper, the flow field is turbulent, the turbulence model is more appropriate to solve such problems as near wall flow problems, and is good at solving out the boundary layer problem with an adverse pressure gradient. As for a turbulence model, the Spalart-Allmaras model is used because it is relatively simple, which is used to figure out an eddy viscosity transport equation [ 14 , 15 ]. As the Spalart-Allmaras model is one kind of Reynolds-average Navier-Stokes (RANS) model [ 16 ], the Reynolds number and the turbulent magnitude are considered accordingly in this paper.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Of Wing Flow Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For cruise flight velocity of 185 m/s and altitude 6,000 m, and for assumed surface roughness height of h=10 μm, the roughness Reynolds number is Re h =V · h/v=185 · 10 · 10 -6 /0.242 · 10 -4 =76.4. From [10] it follows that Re t =1 · 10 6 gives the transition position of l t =0,170 m. Since the laminar part is very short, it is accepted that the boundary layer of each aircraft part is turbulent. If the surface roughness height was bigger, this assumption would be even more justified, since this means an even shorter laminar boundary layer.…”
Section: The First Part Of the Axial Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are experimental, empirical, and CFD methods used as correction technique data depending on the flow conditions (Reynolds and Mach number effects), geometry, and types of measurements [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Many experimental and empirical methods are used in combination with CFD technology for more accurate results [6], [7], [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%