2015
DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20152105011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation of a new 2D CDM model in predicting failure in HFQing of an automotive panel

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper a comparative analysis of failure prediction when using the solution heat treatment cold die forming and quenching process, known as HFQ TM , for forming an aluminium alloy AA6082 automotive panel part (bulkhead panel), is presented. An experimental programme has been designed and a series of tests have been carried out to investigate the effect of process parameters on the success of forming the complex-shaped automotive panel component using the high strength aluminium alloy. A set of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[156] Further numerical and experimental investigations were conducted to investigate the thickness distribution in complex-shaped components of AA6082 after both the new hot forming process and cold forming. [162] The FE model developed showed good agreement with the experimental results obtained after hot forming Figure 17. Illustration and comparison of the formed parts after using the HFQ process in a) AA6082 and c) AA7075 versus the b) conventional forming process AA6082 and d) AA 7075 at room temperature.…”
Section: Hot Forming-quenching Of Aluminum Alloyssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[156] Further numerical and experimental investigations were conducted to investigate the thickness distribution in complex-shaped components of AA6082 after both the new hot forming process and cold forming. [162] The FE model developed showed good agreement with the experimental results obtained after hot forming Figure 17. Illustration and comparison of the formed parts after using the HFQ process in a) AA6082 and c) AA7075 versus the b) conventional forming process AA6082 and d) AA 7075 at room temperature.…”
Section: Hot Forming-quenching Of Aluminum Alloyssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…[ 156 ] Further numerical and experimental investigations were conducted to investigate the thickness distribution in complex‐shaped components of AA6082 after both the new hot forming process and cold forming. [ 162 ] The FE model developed showed good agreement with the experimental results obtained after hot forming ( Figure ). In addition, this study demonstrated the advantages of the new process, in terms of better formability, over the traditional cold forming process for complex‐shaped components (Figure 20c,d).…”
Section: Hot Forming–quenching Of Aluminum Alloyssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Published literature on HFQ® focuses largely on the development of advanced material models that predict the material constitutive behaviour under HFQ® conditions [4,6,[8][9][10]. These models are then used to accurately simulate the forming response of HFQ® formed components using Finite Element (FE) simulations [5,9,11] in order to assess their manufacturing feasibility. Though useful, forming simulations usually take place late in design processes, when the component design is near completion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%