2013
DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v14i2.3692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation into the use of MMCTP to tune accelerator source parameters and testing its clinical application

Abstract: This paper presents an alternative method to tune Monte Carlo electron beam parameters to match measured data using a minimal set of variables in order to reduce the model setup time prior to clinical implementation of the model. Monte Carlo calculations provide the possibility of a powerful treatment planning verification technique. The nonstandardized and nonautomated process of tuning the required accelerator model is one of the reasons for delays in the clinical implementation of Monte Carlo techniques. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These voxelized geometries, or MC phantoms, can be based on DICOM images, or user defined material and geometry. The McGill Monte Carlo treatment planning software (MMCTP Version 9.1.1) was employed for the comparison and analysis of dose distributions from a clinical treatment planning system (TPS) with MC dose calculations (using BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc) …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These voxelized geometries, or MC phantoms, can be based on DICOM images, or user defined material and geometry. The McGill Monte Carlo treatment planning software (MMCTP Version 9.1.1) was employed for the comparison and analysis of dose distributions from a clinical treatment planning system (TPS) with MC dose calculations (using BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc) …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monte Carlo simulations were submitted to a remote cluster. Previous tuning (21) provided a refined BEAMnrc linear accelerator model that agreed with measured dose profile curves to an accuracy of within 2% or 3 mm for square fields with sides of 3 cm up to 30 cm and within 1% for the output factors for field sizes of 40×40 cm2, 30×30 cm2, 5×5 cm2, 4×4 cm2, and 3×3 cm2. The initial electron energy and FWHM of the radius of the initial electron beam incident on the target was varied to find the percentage depth dose, dose profile curves, and output factors that match the hospital‐measured data, providing output factors that match within 1% of measured output factor values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The properties of the initial electron beam are the energy spectrum and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the Gaussian source. In the literature, it is noted that the common way for the tuning process for conventional accelerators is to iteratively change the values of the mean energy and FWHM [19,20]. Using approach of Laccarino et al [21], the tuning approach was done by calculating PDDs using mono-energetic electrons ranging from 1 MeV up to 13 MeV with a step of 0.5 MeV.…”
Section: Tuning Of MC Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%