2015
DOI: 10.1037/rep0000062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation into the temporal scaling of community participation measurement.

Abstract: Understanding the implications of temporal resolution for participation measures is valuable for advancing ecological participation models. Future research is needed to develop consensus on participation measurement and provide a solid basis for developing ecological models of participation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose of this study is to examine the within day associations between discrimination and nicotine and substance use among SGM individuals using ecological momentary assessment (EMA). This methodology, which involves multiple within day measurements and, as such, is sensitive enough to detect momentary fluctuations over time, has been regarded as the “gold standard” in terms of in situ self-report methodologies (Livingston, Hargrove, et al, 2015; Robbins & Kubiak, 2014; Kamarck, Shiffman, & Wethington, 2011). It was expected that use of this methodology would enable detection of discrimination effects in real/near-real time, and provide insight into the duration of these effects as they relate to within day risk for nicotine and substance use.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this study is to examine the within day associations between discrimination and nicotine and substance use among SGM individuals using ecological momentary assessment (EMA). This methodology, which involves multiple within day measurements and, as such, is sensitive enough to detect momentary fluctuations over time, has been regarded as the “gold standard” in terms of in situ self-report methodologies (Livingston, Hargrove, et al, 2015; Robbins & Kubiak, 2014; Kamarck, Shiffman, & Wethington, 2011). It was expected that use of this methodology would enable detection of discrimination effects in real/near-real time, and provide insight into the duration of these effects as they relate to within day risk for nicotine and substance use.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%