2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation into the removal of Salmonella and enteric indicator bacteria from the separated liquid fraction of raw or anaerobically digested pig manure using novel on-farm woodchip biofilters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Treatment of the liquid fraction of anaerobically digested (AD) pig manure in meso-scale (midway between bench and pilot-scale) ICWs reduced indicator bacteria (McCarthy et al, 2011b). Furthermore, in on-farm ICWs treating agricultural wastewater, including the liquid fraction of AD pig manure, and woodchip biofilters treating the liquid fraction of manure, Salmonella, including antibiotic-resistant strains, was undetectable in the effluent (McCarthy et al, 2011b(McCarthy et al, , 2015a. Thus, management strategies can be successful in reducing pathogens, including antibiotic-resistant strains, in pig manure and its separated solid and liquid fractions.…”
Section: Management Of Pig Manurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment of the liquid fraction of anaerobically digested (AD) pig manure in meso-scale (midway between bench and pilot-scale) ICWs reduced indicator bacteria (McCarthy et al, 2011b). Furthermore, in on-farm ICWs treating agricultural wastewater, including the liquid fraction of AD pig manure, and woodchip biofilters treating the liquid fraction of manure, Salmonella, including antibiotic-resistant strains, was undetectable in the effluent (McCarthy et al, 2011b(McCarthy et al, , 2015a. Thus, management strategies can be successful in reducing pathogens, including antibiotic-resistant strains, in pig manure and its separated solid and liquid fractions.…”
Section: Management Of Pig Manurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los resultados obtenidos en esta investigación también son comparables, e incluso superan a algunos reportes, en los que se evalúa el efecto de la acidificación a temperatura ambiente de estiércol o el uso de biofiltros sobre la reducción del contenido de bacterias (De la Torre et al 2000, Sahlström et al 2008, Zhang et al 2011, McCarthy et al 2015.…”
Section: Evaluación Microbiológicaunclassified
“…Some multi-stage biological treatment processes, such as combined sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) and constructed wetlands (CWs) (Moir et al, 2005), and aerated settling tanks followed by vertical flow CWs (Merlin and Gaillot, 2010), have been used with varying degrees of success; however, much of the organic and nutrient reductions in these studies have been reported to occur in the aeration rather than in the passive processes. Passive treatment systems such as sand filters (Rodgers et al, 2005;Healy et al, 2007) and woodchip filters (Ruane et al, 2011;McCarthy et al, 2015) have also been investigated and have reported consistently high levels of organic, nutrient and pathogenic removal. Woodchip, in particular, is a cheap, biodegradable material which has potential use as a soil improver (Cogliastro et al, 2001;Miller and Seastedt, 2009) and has previously shown to be effective in improving effluent quality and ammonia emissions when used in out-wintering pads (Dumont et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%