2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation into the influence of drug lipophilicity on the in vivo absorption profiles from subcutaneous microspheres and in situ forming depots

Abstract: Drug lipophilicity is known to have a major influence on in vivo drug absorption from intramuscularly and subcutaneously administered solutions. Indeed, chemical modification to increase drug lipophilicity is used to enable sustained drug release from solutions. In contrast to the wealth of knowledge on drug release from simple solutions, the influence of drug lipophilicity on its release from controlled release formulations, such as, microparticles and in situ forming depots, have not been systematically stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deadman et al 35 defined the initial burst release as the percent of total drug released in the first 24 hours. Different researchers evaluated the drug initial burst by estimating the amount released at the first 24–48 hours.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deadman et al 35 defined the initial burst release as the percent of total drug released in the first 24 hours. Different researchers evaluated the drug initial burst by estimating the amount released at the first 24–48 hours.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The added aspect of microsphere matrix erosion at the injection site may be controlled by chemical parameters, such as polymer or copolymer functionality and polymer-drug interactions, and physical properties such as molecular weight, dispersity, microsphere porosity and diameter, degree of crystallinity, glass transition temperature, hydrophilicity and drug distribution throughout the microsphere [56-58]. Despite these variables, initial burst release profiles are often seen from microsphere injections [59] with further identifiable stages of slow and sustained release and a later stage acceleration as the microsphere degrades [60, 61]. …”
Section: Technologies That Have Been Clinically Successful For La mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial large bonus of drug can result in tissue irritation and even systemic toxicity, also reduced the effective lifetime of implants. The delay between administration and depot formation has been regarded as the chief cause of burst release [9]. Many methods, such as quantitative ultrasound (QUS), photoacoustic (PA) imaging and UV-vis imaging, have been used to monitor the phase separation of ISFIs [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%