2014
DOI: 10.4314/njt.v33i3.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Investigation into the Decision Makers’s Risk Attitude Index Ranking Technique for Fuzzy Critical Path Analysis

Abstract: In this paper, the effectiveness In this paper, the effectiveness In this paper, the effectiveness In this paper, the effectiveness of the decision maker's risk attitude index for fuzzy cri of the decision maker's risk attitude index for fuzzy cri of the decision maker's risk attitude index for fuzzy cri of the decision maker's risk attitude index for fuzzy cri considered. considered. considered. considered. The fuzzy CPM algorithm waThe fuzzy CPM algorithm wa The fuzzy CPM algorithm wa The fuzzy CPM algorithm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculations are carried out using trapezoidal fuzzy numbers ranking formula by Ravi Shankar et al [18] Table 6: Total float of each activity in the fuzzy project network. (6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) (0, 0, 0, 0, 4, 10, 17, 22) 4-7 (10,12,14,15,15,16,18,20) (0, 0, 0, 4, 8, 14, 21, 28) 5-7 (12,12,14,15,16,17,18,20) (0, 0, 0, 0, 3, 9, 16, 21) 6-7 (13,13,15,16,17,18,19,20) (0, 0, 0, 0, 4, 10, 17, 22) Table 7: Total fuzzy slack time for each path in fuzzy project network. By using Area − , Area − , Area + , Area + , and * from this we can get the values of * , * , and Score( * ) values.…”
Section: Sanguansat and Chen Ranking Methods For Trapezoidalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculations are carried out using trapezoidal fuzzy numbers ranking formula by Ravi Shankar et al [18] Table 6: Total float of each activity in the fuzzy project network. (6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) (0, 0, 0, 0, 4, 10, 17, 22) 4-7 (10,12,14,15,15,16,18,20) (0, 0, 0, 4, 8, 14, 21, 28) 5-7 (12,12,14,15,16,17,18,20) (0, 0, 0, 0, 3, 9, 16, 21) 6-7 (13,13,15,16,17,18,19,20) (0, 0, 0, 0, 4, 10, 17, 22) Table 7: Total fuzzy slack time for each path in fuzzy project network. By using Area − , Area − , Area + , Area + , and * from this we can get the values of * , * , and Score( * ) values.…”
Section: Sanguansat and Chen Ranking Methods For Trapezoidalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chanas and Radosinski [14] analyzed the use of fuzzy numbers in the network planning. M. H. Oladeinde and C. A. Oladeinde [15] considered the effectiveness of the decision-makers' risk attitude index for fuzzy critical path analysis. Han et al [16] presented the fuzzy critical path method to find out airport's ground critical operation processes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the scheduling problems addressed, project scheduling has been the most prominent. Traditional scheduling methods such as PERT (The Program Evaluation and Review Technique), [1,2] and CPM (Critical Path Method), are not enough for Production scheduling because they assume that resource availability is unlimited. This assumption is not valid in most practical situations, in which there exist definite limit on the amount of resources available and these resources (renewable nonrenewable) are shared by a number of activities or even projects.…”
Section: Introduction Introduction Introduction Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of fuzzy ranking methods have been used in the literature. The Decision Makers risk attitude index ranking technique has been used by a number of authors namely Oladeinde and Oladeinde (2014) and Liang and Han (2004). Maximizing-Minimizing points have been used by Salashshour et al (2011) for ranking fuzzy numbers.…”
Section: Fuzzy Number Rankingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a very challenging job (Oladeinde and Oladeinde, 2014) as late completion in most cases attracts a penalty. It is not uncommon in the construction of industrial plants to provide performance incentives to contractors for early completion, quality work and adherence to safety rules and regulations (Bubshait, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%