2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04812-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation into the beneficial effects of high-dose interferon beta 1-a, compared to low-dose interferon beta 1-a (the base therapeutic regimen) in moderate to severe COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled l trial

Abstract: Objectives We will investigate the effectiveness of high dose Interferon Beta 1a, compared to low dose Interferon Beta 1a (the base therapeutic regimen) in COVID-19 Confirmed Cases (Either RT-PCR or CT Scan Confirmed) with moderate to severe disease Trial Design This is a single center, open label, randomized, controlled, 2-arm parallel group (1:1 ratio), clinical trial. Participants The eligibility criteria in this study is: age ≥ 18 years, oxygen saturation (SPO2) ≤ 93% or respiratory rate ≥ 24, at least… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…U1111-1189-1653 Compare diverse immunomodulatory treatment (IFNβ among them) REMAP-CAP trial https://www.remapcap.org/ International mullti- centric > 4000 The trial is multifactorial as it tests multiple interventions Patients admitted to ICU with acute respiratory insufficiency due to suspected pneumonia The trial generates estimates of superiority, inferiority, and equivalence between regimens on the primary outcome of 90-day mortality, stratified by presence or absence of concomitant shock and proven or suspected influenza infection [ 138 ] IFNβ-1a NCT04449380 Compare IFNb-1a+ standard care vs. standard care alone INTERCOP trial randomized, controlled, open-label, phase II trial Italy mono-centric s.c. 44 μg (12 MIU) 3 times × week at least 48h apart, for 2 weeks 126 randomized 2:1 to IFNβ-1a No other anti-viral drugs will be used as part of the regimens, both in the control and the intervention arms Patients with positive swab detection of SARS-CoV-2, radiological signs of pneumonia, and mild-to-moderate disease The primary outcome is the time to negative conversion of SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swabs. Secondary outcomes include improvement or worsening in a clinical severity score measured on a 7-point ordinal scale, among others [ 139 ] IFNβ-1a NCT04521400 ongoing Compare high- vs. low-dose IFNβ Randomized open-label controlled 2-arm parallel group; phase 2a trial Iran single center Arm 1: high-dose IFN arm 2: low-dose IFN Intention to treat: 50 patients per arm All patients will receive LPV/R SPO2<93% or RR> 24 + one of the following manifestations: B.T<37.8 °C or cough, or shortness of breath or nasal congestion/discharge, or myalgia/arthralgia or diarrhea/vomiting or headache or fatigue on admission Primary outcome: time to clinical improvement Secondary outcome: (a) mortality at the end of the study; (b) Improvement of SPO2 during hospitalization; (c) duration of hospitalization; (d) incidence of mechanical ventilation [ 140 ] Previous studies IFNβ-1a NCT02622724 Efficacy and adverse events of IFNβ in patients with moderate ARDS Randomized double-blind parallel-group trial E.U. Multi-center n=74 ICU in 8 countries <...>…”
Section: Ifn-α2 In Past and Current Covid Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…U1111-1189-1653 Compare diverse immunomodulatory treatment (IFNβ among them) REMAP-CAP trial https://www.remapcap.org/ International mullti- centric > 4000 The trial is multifactorial as it tests multiple interventions Patients admitted to ICU with acute respiratory insufficiency due to suspected pneumonia The trial generates estimates of superiority, inferiority, and equivalence between regimens on the primary outcome of 90-day mortality, stratified by presence or absence of concomitant shock and proven or suspected influenza infection [ 138 ] IFNβ-1a NCT04449380 Compare IFNb-1a+ standard care vs. standard care alone INTERCOP trial randomized, controlled, open-label, phase II trial Italy mono-centric s.c. 44 μg (12 MIU) 3 times × week at least 48h apart, for 2 weeks 126 randomized 2:1 to IFNβ-1a No other anti-viral drugs will be used as part of the regimens, both in the control and the intervention arms Patients with positive swab detection of SARS-CoV-2, radiological signs of pneumonia, and mild-to-moderate disease The primary outcome is the time to negative conversion of SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swabs. Secondary outcomes include improvement or worsening in a clinical severity score measured on a 7-point ordinal scale, among others [ 139 ] IFNβ-1a NCT04521400 ongoing Compare high- vs. low-dose IFNβ Randomized open-label controlled 2-arm parallel group; phase 2a trial Iran single center Arm 1: high-dose IFN arm 2: low-dose IFN Intention to treat: 50 patients per arm All patients will receive LPV/R SPO2<93% or RR> 24 + one of the following manifestations: B.T<37.8 °C or cough, or shortness of breath or nasal congestion/discharge, or myalgia/arthralgia or diarrhea/vomiting or headache or fatigue on admission Primary outcome: time to clinical improvement Secondary outcome: (a) mortality at the end of the study; (b) Improvement of SPO2 during hospitalization; (c) duration of hospitalization; (d) incidence of mechanical ventilation [ 140 ] Previous studies IFNβ-1a NCT02622724 Efficacy and adverse events of IFNβ in patients with moderate ARDS Randomized double-blind parallel-group trial E.U. Multi-center n=74 ICU in 8 countries <...>…”
Section: Ifn-α2 In Past and Current Covid Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical trials are being conducted to investigate its effectiveness against COVID-19 infection ( Alavi Darazam et al, 2020 ). It has also been found to be effective previously against SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV and suggested presently for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 ( Arabi et al, 2020 ; Jamilloux et al, 2020 ; Sallard et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Drugs Being Investigated For the Treatment Of Covid-19 And Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As numerous experimental agents progress on the pipeline, we expect the emergence of more safe and efficacious treatments to treat COVID-19. Other investigational agents with promising prospects include interferon beta [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ], and tocilizumab [ 24 , 25 ]. As of this writing, from the total number of registered COVID-19 related clinical trials, 1993 are actively recruiting or not yet recruiting participants, and we expect new treatments to be available soon.…”
Section: Approved and Experimental Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%