2014
DOI: 10.1007/jhep03(2014)101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An inverse scattering formalism for STU supergravity

Abstract: STU supergravity becomes an integrable system for solutions that effectively only depend on two variables. This class of solutions includes the Kerr solution and its charged generalizations that have been studied in the literature. We here present an inverse scattering method that allows to systematically construct solutions of this integrable system. The method is similar to the one of Belinski and Zakharov for pure gravity but uses a different linear system due to Breitenlohner and Maison and here requires s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the limit ρ → 0 + (with v = 0), we have 8) in agreement with (10.2). The terms proportional to k 1 and to k 2 are thus projected out and do not appear in the monodromy matrix M(ω).…”
Section: Jhep06(2017)123supporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the limit ρ → 0 + (with v = 0), we have 8) in agreement with (10.2). The terms proportional to k 1 and to k 2 are thus projected out and do not appear in the monodromy matrix M(ω).…”
Section: Jhep06(2017)123supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Most of the literature is focussed on existence, and employs factorization algorithms that quickly become very cumbersome when applied in practice. Moreover [5] and the subsequent literature, including [6][7][8][9], impose a particular ansatz which requires the spacetime to be asymptotically flat and the monodromy matrix to have only first order poles in ω. These are severe limitations as they exclude extremal solutions, and the attractors solutions which are their near-horizon limits.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations