2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2014.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An inverse optimization strategy to determine single crystal mechanical behavior from polycrystal tests: Application to AZ31 Mg alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If some components of the far-field deformation gradient are not known a priori (mixed boundary conditions, as in uniaxial compression), the corresponding components of the effective stresses are applied instead following the strategy presented in [23].…”
Section: Computational Homogenization Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If some components of the far-field deformation gradient are not known a priori (mixed boundary conditions, as in uniaxial compression), the corresponding components of the effective stresses are applied instead following the strategy presented in [23].…”
Section: Computational Homogenization Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any case, the determination of the single-crystal behavior still remains the main issue in polycrystalline homogenization. Different approaches can be used to obtain the single crystal properties: from a multiscale bottom-up approach ranging from the heterogeneous subgrain microstructure to the grain mesoscale [18], to an inverse analysis strategy in which the single crystal behavior is chosen to reproduce the results of a set of mechanical tests in polycrystals [19][20][21][22][23] or of a set of indentation tests in single crystals [24,25]. Neither strategy is fully convincing as multiscale modeling strategies are not yet mature enough and the extrapolation of the parameters obtained by inverse analysis strategies to other scenarios (different from the one used in the inverse analysis) can be questioned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is easy to anticipate that large uncertainty of modeling parameters may also induce large uncertainty of predicted local fields calculated within a polycrystalline model (see the next section for more details). Anyhow, finding a "true" parameter set from raw polycrystalline data is certainly possible, but may require additional validation with other complementary experiments [46]. …”
Section: Comparison With Simpler Hardening Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters can be extracted from experimental data by several algorithms (see an example of the use of the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm in [19]). The different iterations of the identification algorithm require multiple resolutions of the direct problem and this can be excessively timeconsuming.…”
Section: Example 1: Calibration Of Materials Parameters For Polycrystamentioning
confidence: 99%