1985
DOI: 10.2514/3.45162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An inverse boundary element method for single component airfoil design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At each station the shape factor was defined from a combination of measurement and prediction, and the flow at the station was modelled by an F-S boundary layer with the same shape factor. Also, the pressure gradients around the aerofoil were predicted theoretically using the method of Soinne & Laine (1988). It was found that by matching the shape factors at each chordwise station, the pressure gradient calculated from the selected F-S profile matched that calculated for the aerofoil typically to within 20 %.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelling Of Instability Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At each station the shape factor was defined from a combination of measurement and prediction, and the flow at the station was modelled by an F-S boundary layer with the same shape factor. Also, the pressure gradients around the aerofoil were predicted theoretically using the method of Soinne & Laine (1988). It was found that by matching the shape factors at each chordwise station, the pressure gradient calculated from the selected F-S profile matched that calculated for the aerofoil typically to within 20 %.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelling Of Instability Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(6) and (10). Avoiding subsequent matrix operations is a significant point in favor of iterative-calculation economy, because the matrix setup and inversion of influence coefficients are the most time-consuming procedures in the panel methods.…”
Section: Panel Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For evaluation of the overall transition modeling, two different angles of attack with different transition models have been used at Re = 3 × 10 6 . The results are shown in Tables 2 and 3.…”
Section: Evaluating the Analysis Methods Evaluation Of The Transition mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A three dimensional version of the SFC formulation remains to be developed. A similar concept derived from the boundary element integral method" gives a fully converged solution for an airfoil design on a -personal computer in[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] iterations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%