2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2015.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An inventory pooling model for spare units of critical systems that serve multi-companies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AHP has ability to structure and cluster all factors in a hierarchical manner to deal with the complex nature of a problem (Naesens et al, 2009;Subramanian and Ramanathan, 2012). As shown in the findings and literature review sections, inventory strategy selection for aircraft spare part is a complex decision-making problem due to the stockout cost and their implications (Erkoc and Ertogal, 2016), the stringent regulation (Vieira and Loures, 2016), the spare part price (de Souza et al, 2011), the long lead time and the unscheduled removal (Wang and Yue, 2015), hence is a good candidate to test AHP solutions. Unlike other decision-making method, AHP can cope with the complexity of the problem thanks to its hierarchical structure and its pairwise comparison concept (Saaty, 2008).…”
Section: Rq2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…AHP has ability to structure and cluster all factors in a hierarchical manner to deal with the complex nature of a problem (Naesens et al, 2009;Subramanian and Ramanathan, 2012). As shown in the findings and literature review sections, inventory strategy selection for aircraft spare part is a complex decision-making problem due to the stockout cost and their implications (Erkoc and Ertogal, 2016), the stringent regulation (Vieira and Loures, 2016), the spare part price (de Souza et al, 2011), the long lead time and the unscheduled removal (Wang and Yue, 2015), hence is a good candidate to test AHP solutions. Unlike other decision-making method, AHP can cope with the complexity of the problem thanks to its hierarchical structure and its pairwise comparison concept (Saaty, 2008).…”
Section: Rq2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some aircraft parts are very expensive and critical, for example, wheels and brakes can cost USD 4 million (de Souza et al, 2011). Some of them have long lead times and high variation of the 'Mean Time Between Unscheduled Removal' (MTBUR) according to Wang and Yue, (2015). Hence, an excess spare part inventory requires a significant amount of capital investment and can impede cash flow, which should be avoided (Gu et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al (2014) demonstrate that the performance of collaborative planning for a logistics hub is superior to that resulting from decisions taken separately by suppliers and manufacturers. Wang and Yue (2015) develop a decision making model to determine the number of companies in a coalition that can share the storage cost of spare units. Kim and Benjaafar (2002) examine the benefits of inventory pooling in systems with finite capacity.…”
Section: Logistics Poolingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Ballot & Fontane (2010) show that transport pooling allows reducing CO 2 emissions by 25%. Wang & Yue (2015) develop a decisionmaking model to determine the number of companies from a coalition to share the storage cost of such spare units.…”
Section: Pooled Warehousementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several research streams can be found about the number and the location of central warehouses as well as the associated demand assignments in order to optimize holding and distribution costs (Lee and Jeong, 2009), the number of companies that should take part in a centralization initiative (Wang and Yue, 2015), the drivers for warehouse centralization (Pedersen et al, 2012), the potential of warehouse centralization to mitigate supply and demand risks (Schmitt et al, 2015), the impacts of allocation rules on inventory and service levels (Alptekinoğlu et al, 2012;Çelebi, 2015;Wanke and Saliby, 2009) and the allocation of costs and benefits among the parties involved in warehouse centralization (Karsten and Basten, 2014;Wong et al, 2007).…”
Section: Warehouse Centralizationmentioning
confidence: 99%