2013
DOI: 10.1180/dhz
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Introduction to the Rock-Forming Minerals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

47
1,562
2
218

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,211 publications
(2,053 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
47
1,562
2
218
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to both the larger volume of the sediment primary particles (~0.2 μm) and higher refractive index. Refractive indices of the three sediment types are (geometric mean of the three axes): goethite: n = 2.18; illite: n = 1.58; kaolinite: n = 1.56; montmorillonite: n = 1.55 (Deer et al, 1992;Shannon et al, 2002;Weidler and Friedrich, 2007) compared to φ6 particles (80 nm), the sediment primary particles have a higher scattering cross-section than the virions. Therefore, the heteroaggregation experiments were performed using a higher concentration of viral particles than sediments.…”
Section: Heteroaggregation Turbiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to both the larger volume of the sediment primary particles (~0.2 μm) and higher refractive index. Refractive indices of the three sediment types are (geometric mean of the three axes): goethite: n = 2.18; illite: n = 1.58; kaolinite: n = 1.56; montmorillonite: n = 1.55 (Deer et al, 1992;Shannon et al, 2002;Weidler and Friedrich, 2007) compared to φ6 particles (80 nm), the sediment primary particles have a higher scattering cross-section than the virions. Therefore, the heteroaggregation experiments were performed using a higher concentration of viral particles than sediments.…”
Section: Heteroaggregation Turbiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Garnet is commonly employed as a pathfinder mineral in diamond exploration (see, e.g., Gurney and Zweistra 1995) and also used in provenance studies to identify and characterise potential lithologies contributing to detrital sediments and discriminate different sediment sources (von Eynnatten andDunkl 2012, Krippner et al 2014). Garnet is especially useful in these contexts for three reasons: (i) its broad spectrum of major, minor and trace element composition (Anthony et al 1995); (ii) its presence in both igneous and metamorphic rocks (Deer et al 1992); and (iii) its relative stability during weathering and transport (Pettijohn 1941). Garnet composition is governed by source rock bulk composition together with its temperature and pressure history, and particular compositions can be correlated to different source lithologies (Morton et al 2004, Suggate andHall 2013), so that detrital garnet provides a window into source rock composition and sediment provenance Our particular interest in garnet is that kimberlites often contain xenocrystic minerals formed under upper-mantle conditions such as pyrope garnet, picro-ilmenite, chromian spinel and chrome-diopside (Dawson 1980) and frequently is found as inclusions in diamond (Shimizu and Richardson 1987).…”
Section: Garnetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this application, it was necessary to determine the major and trace element composition of garnet for purposes of identification and discrimination from garnet of nonmantle origin, as the silicate minerals associated with diamond have well-defined ranges in chemical composition. Pyrope, which is exceptionally rare in upper crustal rocks but is occasionally transported to the Earth's surface in alpine peridotites and in alkaline volcanic rocks and kimberlites produced in deep mantle sources (Deer et al 1992), is the main garnet type of interest in this context. Kimberlite garnets associated with diamonds tend to be low-Ca and Ti-poor, but enriched in Mg and Cr (Gurney et al 1993).…”
Section: Garnetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the far eastern sector, near Mahoba, reddening of granitoid is common on outcrops, particularly in the immediate contacts of mafic dyke/dykelets with granitoids, with gradual decrease in reddening intensity away from the contacts (Figure 2b). Geological Survey of India (GSI) report (Kumar & Bodas, 1991-1992 suggests abundance of mafic dykes in the southern sector of the craton. However, plausible connection of frequent dolerite occurrences (as mentioned in GSI report) and more reddening of granitoids in the southern part of the craton as suggested by (Ray et al, 2016 and reference therein) remains to be established.…”
Section: Field Aspects Of Grey and Red Granitoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%